mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@codeaurora.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V4 1/1] perf: event preserve and create across cpu hotplug
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:55:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59600c6b-bc5c-ca97-f998-a95603843883@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560865617-7881-2-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org>

Friendly Ping.

More explanation of the usecase added in the coverletter
[PATCH RESEND V4 0/1] perf: Add CPU hotplug support for events.

-Mukesh

On 6/18/2019 7:16 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Perf framework doesn't allow preserving CPU events across
> CPU hotplugs. The events are scheduled out as and when the
> CPU walks offline. Moreover, the framework also doesn't
> allow the clients to create events on an offline CPU. As
> a result, the clients have to keep on monitoring the CPU
> state until it comes back online.
>
> Therefore, introducing the perf framework to support creation
> and preserving of (CPU) events for offline CPUs. Through
> this, the CPU's online state would be transparent to the
> client and it not have to worry about monitoring the CPU's
> state. Success would be returned to the client even while
> creating the event on an offline CPU. If during the lifetime
> of the event the CPU walks offline, the event would be
> preserved and would continue to count as soon as (and if) the
> CPU comes back online.
>
> Co-authored-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> ---
> Change in V4:
> =============
> - Released, __get_cpu_context would not be correct way to get the
>    cpu context of the cpu which is offline, instead use
>    container_of to get the cpuctx from ctx.
>
> - Changed the goto label name inside event_function_call from
>    'remove_event_from_context' to 'out'.
>
> Change in V3:
> =============
> - Jiri has tried perf stat -a and removed one of the cpu from the other
>    terminal. This resulted in a crash. Crash was because in
>    event_function_call(), we were passing NULL as cpuctx in
>    func(event, NULL, ctx, data).Fixed it in this patch.
>
> Change in V2:
> =============
> As per long back discussion happened at
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/15/1324
>
> Peter.Z. has suggested to do thing in different way and shared
> patch as well. This patch fixes the issue seen while trying
> to achieve the purpose.
>
> Fixed issue on top of Peter's patch:
> ===================================
> 1. Added a NULL check on task to avoid crash in __perf_install_in_context.
>
> 2. while trying to add event to context when cpu is offline.
>     Inside add_event_to_ctx() to make consistent state machine while hotplug.
>
> -event->state += PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET;
> +event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET;
>
> 3. In event_function_call(), added a label 'remove_event_from_ctx' to
>     delete events from context list while cpu is offline.
>
>   include/linux/perf_event.h |   1 +
>   kernel/events/core.c       | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 3dc01cf..52b14b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ enum perf_event_state {
>   	PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF		= -1,
>   	PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE	=  0,
>   	PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE		=  1,
> +	PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET	= -32,
>   };
>   
>   struct file;
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 118ad1a..82b5106 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ static int event_function(void *info)
>   static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *data)
>   {
>   	struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
> +	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx =
> +				container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx);
>   	struct task_struct *task = READ_ONCE(ctx->task); /* verified in event_function */
>   	struct event_function_struct efs = {
>   		.event = event,
> @@ -264,17 +266,18 @@ static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *da
>   		lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!task) {
> -		cpu_function_call(event->cpu, event_function, &efs);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>   	if (task == TASK_TOMBSTONE)
>   		return;
>   
>   again:
> -	if (!task_function_call(task, event_function, &efs))
> -		return;
> +	if (task) {
> +		if (!task_function_call(task, event_function, &efs))
> +			return;
> +	} else {
> +		if (!cpu_function_call(event->cpu, event_function, &efs))
> +			return;
> +	}
> +
>   
>   	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>   	/*
> @@ -286,11 +289,17 @@ static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *da
>   		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>   		return;
>   	}
> +
> +	if (!task)
> +		goto out;
> +
>   	if (ctx->is_active) {
>   		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>   		goto again;
>   	}
> -	func(event, NULL, ctx, data);
> +
> +out:
> +	func(event, cpuctx, ctx, data);
>   	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>   }
>   
> @@ -2310,7 +2319,7 @@ static void perf_set_shadow_time(struct perf_event *event,
>   	struct perf_event *event, *partial_group = NULL;
>   	struct pmu *pmu = ctx->pmu;
>   
> -	if (group_event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
> +	if (group_event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	pmu->start_txn(pmu, PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD);
> @@ -2389,6 +2398,14 @@ static int group_can_go_on(struct perf_event *event,
>   static void add_event_to_ctx(struct perf_event *event,
>   			       struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>   {
> +	if (!ctx->task) {
> +		struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx =
> +			container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx);
> +
> +		if (!cpuctx->online)
> +			event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET;
> +	}
> +
>   	list_add_event(event, ctx);
>   	perf_group_attach(event);
>   }
> @@ -2576,11 +2593,6 @@ static int  __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>   	 */
>   	smp_store_release(&event->ctx, ctx);
>   
> -	if (!task) {
> -		cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, event);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * Should not happen, we validate the ctx is still alive before calling.
>   	 */
> @@ -2619,8 +2631,14 @@ static int  __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>   	 */
>   	smp_mb();
>   again:
> -	if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context, event))
> -		return;
> +
> +	if (task) {
> +		if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context, event))
> +			return;
> +	} else {
> +		if (!cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, event))
> +			return;
> +	}
>   
>   	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>   	task = ctx->task;
> @@ -2637,7 +2655,7 @@ static int  __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>   	 * If the task is not running, ctx->lock will avoid it becoming so,
>   	 * thus we can safely install the event.
>   	 */
> -	if (task_curr(task)) {
> +	if (task && task_curr(task)) {
>   		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>   		goto again;
>   	}
> @@ -11022,16 +11040,7 @@ static int perf_event_set_clock(struct perf_event *event, clockid_t clk_id)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!task) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Check if the @cpu we're creating an event for is online.
> -		 *
> -		 * We use the perf_cpu_context::ctx::mutex to serialize against
> -		 * the hotplug notifiers. See perf_event_{init,exit}_cpu().
> -		 */
> -		struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx =
> -			container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx);
> -
> -		if (!cpuctx->online) {
> +		if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) {
>   			err = -ENODEV;
>   			goto err_locked;
>   		}
> @@ -11213,15 +11222,7 @@ struct perf_event *
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!task) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Check if the @cpu we're creating an event for is online.
> -		 *
> -		 * We use the perf_cpu_context::ctx::mutex to serialize against
> -		 * the hotplug notifiers. See perf_event_{init,exit}_cpu().
> -		 */
> -		struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx =
> -			container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx);
> -		if (!cpuctx->online) {
> +		if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) {
>   			err = -ENODEV;
>   			goto err_unlock;
>   		}
> @@ -11949,17 +11950,48 @@ static void perf_swevent_init_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>   }
>   
>   #if defined CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || defined CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> +static void __perf_event_init_cpu_context(void *__info)
> +{
> +	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __info;
> +	struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
> +	struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
> +	struct perf_event *event;
> +
> +	perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
> +	ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
> +	if (task_ctx)
> +		ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry)
> +		perf_event_set_state(event, event->state - PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET);
> +
> +	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current);
> +	perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static void _perf_event_init_cpu_context(int cpu, struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> +{
> +	smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_init_cpu_context, cpuctx, 1);
> +}
> +
>   static void __perf_event_exit_context(void *__info)
>   {
> -	struct perf_event_context *ctx = __info;
> -	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
> +	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __info;
> +	struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
> +	struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
>   	struct perf_event *event;
>   
> -	raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> -	ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
> -	list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry)
> -		__perf_remove_from_context(event, cpuctx, ctx, (void *)DETACH_GROUP);
> -	raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +	perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
> +	ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
> +	if (task_ctx)
> +		ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry)
> +		perf_event_set_state(event,
> +			event->state + PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET);
> +
> +	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current);
> +	perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
>   }
>   
>   static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
> @@ -11974,7 +12006,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
>   		ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
>   
>   		mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
> -		smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_exit_context, ctx, 1);
> +		smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_exit_context, cpuctx, 1);
>   		cpuctx->online = 0;
>   		mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
>   	}
> @@ -11982,7 +12014,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
>   	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
>   }
>   #else
> -
> +static void _perf_event_init_cpu_context(int cpu, struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx) { }
>   static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu) { }
>   
>   #endif
> @@ -12003,6 +12035,7 @@ int perf_event_init_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>   
>   		mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
>   		cpuctx->online = 1;
> +		_perf_event_init_cpu_context(cpu, cpuctx);
>   		mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
>   	}
>   	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-02  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31 13:39 [PATCH V2 0/1] perf: Add CPU hotplug support for events Mukesh Ojha
2019-05-31 13:39 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] perf: event preserve and create across cpu hotplug Mukesh Ojha
2019-06-03 17:53   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-06-04 14:09     ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-06-12 10:57   ` [PATCH V3] " Mukesh Ojha
2019-06-18  8:54     ` [PATCH V4] " Mukesh Ojha
2019-06-18 12:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-18 13:40         ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-06-18 13:46       ` [PATCH RESEND V4 0/1] perf: Add CPU hotplug support for events Mukesh Ojha
2019-06-18 13:46         ` [PATCH RESEND V4 1/1] perf: event preserve and create across cpu hotplug Mukesh Ojha
2019-07-02  8:25           ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2019-06-24  9:01         ` [PATCH RESEND V4 0/1] perf: Add CPU hotplug support for events Mukesh Ojha
2019-07-26  9:06           ` Mukesh Ojha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59600c6b-bc5c-ca97-f998-a95603843883@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mojha@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rananta@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®