mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
To: Harshit Shah <hshah@axiado.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: xilinx_uartps: read reg size from DTS
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:58:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59692110-eca9-4f0f-b6f9-e23bf835733c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250819-xilinx-uartps-reg-size-v1-1-0fb7341023fb@axiado.com>



On 8/19/25 22:53, Harshit Shah wrote:
> Current implementation uses `CDNS_UART_REGISTER_SPACE(0x1000)`
> for request_mem_region() and ioremap() in cdns_uart_request_port() API.
> 
> The cadence/xilinx IP has register space defined from offset 0x0 to 0x48.
> It also mentions that the register map is defined as [6:0]. So, the upper
> region may/maynot be used based on the IP integration.
> 
> In Axiado AX3000 SoC two UART instances are defined
> 0x100 apart. That is creating issue in some other instance due to overlap
> with addresses.
> 
> Since, this address space is already being defined in the
> devicetree, use the same when requesting the register space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Shah <hshah@axiado.com>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 10 +++++-----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> index fe457bf1e15bb4fc77a5c7de2aea8bfbdbaa643a..a66b44d21fba2558d0b2a62864d86d3b73152e26 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>   #define CDNS_UART_MINOR		0	/* works best with devtmpfs */
>   #define CDNS_UART_NR_PORTS	16
>   #define CDNS_UART_FIFO_SIZE	64	/* FIFO size */
> -#define CDNS_UART_REGISTER_SPACE	0x1000
>   #define TX_TIMEOUT		500000
>   
>   /* Rx Trigger level */
> @@ -1098,15 +1097,15 @@ static int cdns_uart_verify_port(struct uart_port *port,
>    */
>   static int cdns_uart_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
>   {
> -	if (!request_mem_region(port->mapbase, CDNS_UART_REGISTER_SPACE,
> +	if (!request_mem_region(port->mapbase, port->mapsize,
>   					 CDNS_UART_NAME)) {
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>   
> -	port->membase = ioremap(port->mapbase, CDNS_UART_REGISTER_SPACE);
> +	port->membase = ioremap(port->mapbase, port->mapsize);
>   	if (!port->membase) {
>   		dev_err(port->dev, "Unable to map registers\n");
> -		release_mem_region(port->mapbase, CDNS_UART_REGISTER_SPACE);
> +		release_mem_region(port->mapbase, port->mapsize);
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>   	return 0;
> @@ -1121,7 +1120,7 @@ static int cdns_uart_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
>    */
>   static void cdns_uart_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
>   {
> -	release_mem_region(port->mapbase, CDNS_UART_REGISTER_SPACE);
> +	release_mem_region(port->mapbase, port->mapsize);
>   	iounmap(port->membase);
>   	port->membase = NULL;
>   }
> @@ -1780,6 +1779,7 @@ static int cdns_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	 * and triggers invocation of the config_port() entry point.
>   	 */
>   	port->mapbase = res->start;
> +	port->mapsize = resource_size(res);
>   	port->irq = irq;
>   	port->dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(cdns_uart_data->uartclk);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 8742b2d8935f476449ef37e263bc4da3295c7b58
> change-id: 20250813-xilinx-uartps-reg-size-c3be67d88b7c
> 
> Best regards,

yes. There is no reason to hardcode it to 0x1000. Only 0x48 is used on our 
silicon. Information about size can be taken from DT.

Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>

Thanks,
Michal


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-20  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-19 20:53 Harshit Shah
2025-08-20  6:58 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2025-08-22 18:58 Harshit Shah
2025-08-23  6:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-26 17:23   ` Harshit Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59692110-eca9-4f0f-b6f9-e23bf835733c@amd.com \
    --to=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hshah@axiado.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®