Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: put_device: Include of_node_put to avoid false positives

[Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>]

> The node reference increased by of_find_device_by_node() can also be
> released by using a call to of_node_put(). Hence when this exists, the
> script should not trigger a warning, which otherwise will be a false
> positive.

Could you explain more about why of_node_put is sufficient?

thanks,
julia

> Also, improve the warning message to include of_node_put too is missing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> ---
> scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
> b/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
> index f09f1e79bfa6..259195b501aa 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
> @@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ type T,T1,T2,T3;
> 
> id = of_find_device_by_node@p1(x)
> ... when != e = id
> +    when != of_node_put(x)
> if (id == NULL || ...) { ... return ...; }
> ... when != put_device(&id->dev)
> +    when != of_node_put(x)
>     when != platform_device_put(id)
>     when != if (id) { ... put_device(&id->dev) ... }
>     when != e1 = (T)id
> @@ -42,7 +44,7 @@ p2 << search.p2;
> @@
> 
> coccilib.report.print_report(p2[0],
> -                             "ERROR: missing put_device; call
> of_find_device_by_node on line "
> +                             "ERROR: missing put_device or of_node_put; call
> of_find_device_by_node on line "
>                              + p1[0].line
>                              + ", but without a corresponding object release within this function.")
> 
> --
> 2.34.1