From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:32:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <597807912.1032600740@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595579668.1032598511@[10.10.2.3]>
> Anyway, I'm giving your code a quick spin ... will give you some
> results later ;-)
Hmmm .... well I ran the One True Benchmark (tm). The patch
*increased* my kernel compile time from about 20s to about 28s.
Not sure I like that idea ;-) Anything you'd like tweaked, or
more info? Both user and system time were up ... I'll grab a
profile of kernel stuff.
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-21 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-21 9:59 Erich Focht
2002-09-21 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Erich Focht
2002-09-21 15:55 ` [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 16:32 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-09-21 16:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 17:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 17:32 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-21 17:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-21 23:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-22 8:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-22 8:30 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-22 17:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 19:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 21:59 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-22 22:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-22 22:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-23 18:19 ` node affine NUMA scheduler: simple benchmark Erich Focht
2002-09-22 10:35 ` [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler Erich Focht
2002-09-22 10:45 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-22 14:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-23 18:38 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-23 18:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-24 21:04 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-24 21:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 15:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 19:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-24 23:59 ` Matthew Dobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='597807912.1032600740@[10.10.2.3]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®