mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, amit.kucheria@linaro.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] sched: idle: Encapsulate the code to compile it out
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 14:09:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5985714.f7hh9Ej59L@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53635E5F.8070100@linaro.org>

On Friday, May 02, 2014 10:59:11 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 12:56 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:47:25 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 02:01:02 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> Encapsulate the large portion of cpuidle_idle_call inside another
> >>> function so when CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=n, the code will be compiled out.
> >>> Also that is benefitial for the clarity of the code as it removes
> >>> a nested indentation level.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> Well, this conflicts with
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4071541/
> >>
> >> which you haven't commented on and I still want cpuidle_select() to be able to
> >> return negative values because of
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4089631/
> >>
> >> (and I have one more patch on top of these two that requires this).
> >
> > Moreover (along the lines of Nico said) after https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4071541/
> > we actually don't need the #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE in your patch, because cpuidle_select()
> > for CONFIG_CPU_IDLE unset is a static inline returning a negative number and the compiler
> > should optimize out the blocks that depend on it being non-negative.
> 
> Thanks for the head up.
> 
> Actually that was to solve a compilation issue with the next patch when 
> adding the cpuidle state in the struct rq.
> 
> When the option CPU_IDLE is not set, the code assinging the cpu idle 
> state in the rq is still there while in the struct rq the field is 
> compiled out with the ifdef macro. If I rely on the compiler 
> optimization, the compilation error will happen.

I see.

If you don't put the new idle_state field in struct_rq under the #ifdef,
you won't need to worry about the build problem.

Alternatively, you can define

#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
static inline void rq_set_idle_state(struct rq *rq, struct cpuidle_state *state)
{
	rq->idle_state = state;
}
#else
static inline void rq_set_idle_state(struct rq *rq, struct cpuidle_state *state) {}
#endif

and use rq_set_idle_state() to set that field.

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-02 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-30 12:01 Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-30 12:01 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] sched: idle: Store the idle state the cpu is Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-30 22:47 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] sched: idle: Encapsulate the code to compile it out Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-30 22:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-02  8:59     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-02 12:09       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-05-02 13:29         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-02 18:20         ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-02  8:52   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-02 12:09     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-02 13:35       ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-02 15:32         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-06  8:09           ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5985714.f7hh9Ej59L@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®