From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Yiyang Chen <chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Reject offset refcount acquire arguments
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:28:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5986dad827772fb0060f7c4adfb811ad93755a52.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa2336b329055908a401ec3b18f8498ebc03846f.1781852308.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
On Fri, 2026-06-19 at 07:59 +0000, Yiyang Chen wrote:
> bpf_refcount_acquire() increments the refcount at the caller-supplied
> pointer plus the refcount field offset, then returns the caller-supplied
> pointer unchanged.
>
> The verifier records the return value as a base pointer to the refcounted
> object.
>
> bpf_list_pop_front() and bpf_rbtree_remove() can return embedded graph-node
> pointers as PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC with a fixed offset equal to the node
> field offset. Passing such a pointer directly to bpf_refcount_acquire()
> currently passes the refcounted-kptr type check.
>
> That makes the runtime operation start from base + node_off while the
> verifier models the returned pointer as the object base.
>
> Require refcount-acquire arguments to have zero offset. Programs can still
> acquire a refcount from a graph-node-derived pointer after normalizing it
> with container_of().
>
> Fixes: 7c50b1cb76aca ("bpf: Add bpf_refcount_acquire kfunc")
> Signed-off-by: Yiyang Chen <chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> ---
Hi Yiyang,
thank you for the bug report.
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 2abc79dbf..4510fe0b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -12392,6 +12392,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
> reg_arg_name(env, argno));
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> + if (reg->var_off.value != 0) {
I think this check should be handled by check_func_arg_reg_off() /
__check_ptr_off_reg(), could you please reorganize the code such that
it is handled there?
> + verbose(env, "%s must have zero offset when passed to %s\n",
> + reg_arg_name(env, argno), meta->func_name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> if (!type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type))
> meta->arg_owning_ref = true;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 7:59 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-19 7:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-19 19:28 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-06-19 7:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover refcount acquire node offsets Yiyang Chen
2026-06-19 8:47 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-19 19:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-20 15:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Reject offset refcount acquire arguments Yiyang Chen
2026-06-20 15:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-20 17:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-20 15:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover refcount acquire node offsets Yiyang Chen
2026-06-22 2:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Reject offset refcount acquire arguments Yiyang Chen
2026-06-22 2:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-22 22:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-22 2:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover refcount acquire node offsets Yiyang Chen
2026-06-22 22:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-23 6:12 ` Yiyang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5986dad827772fb0060f7c4adfb811ad93755a52.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®