From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cross-compiling vm, confusion over output directory
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:28:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <598c2cfe-debd-3f4c-532f-f78422118451@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR13MB0895E9C11DB4E72158445944FDFA0@MWHPR13MB0895.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Tim,
You are using an ancient email address for me.
Use either shuah@kernel.org or skhan@linuxfoundation.org
On 3/13/20 4:14 PM, Bird, Tim wrote:
> I was working on fixing the cross-compilation for the selftests/vm tests.
> Currently, there are two issues in my testing:
>
> 1) problem: required library missing from some cross-compile environments:
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/mlock-random-test.c requires libcap
> be installed. The target line for mlock-random-test in
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile looks like this:
>
> $(OUTPUT)/mlock-random-test: LDLIBS += -lcap
You can use TEST_GEN_PROGS and define LDFLAGS for lcap
>
> and mlock-random-test.c has this include line:
> #include <sys/capability.h>
>
> this is confusing, since this is different from the header file
> linux/capability.h. It is associated with the capability library (libcap)
> and not the kernel. In any event, on some distros and in some
> cross-compile SDKs the package containing these files is not installed
> by default.
>
> Once this library is installed, things progress farther. Using an Ubuntu
> system, you can install the cross version of this library (for arm64) by doing:
> $ sudo apt install libcap-dev:arm64
>
> 1) solution:
> I would like to add some meta-data about this build dependency, by putting
> something in the settings file as a hint to CI build systems. Specifically, I'd like to
> create the file 'tools/testing/selftests/vm/settings', with the content:
> NEED_LIB=cap
>
> We already use settings for other meta-data about a test (right now, just a
> non-default timeout value), but I don't want to create a new file or syntax
> for this build dependency data.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> I may follow up with some script in the kernel source tree to check these
> dependencies, independent of any CI system. I have such a script in Fuego
> that I could submit, but it would need some work to fit into the kernel build
> flow for kselftest. The goal would be to provide a nicely formatted warning,
> with a recommendation for a package install. But that's more work than
> I think is needed right now just to let developers know there's a build dependency
> here.
>
> 2) problem: reference to source-relative header file
> the Makefile for vm uses a relative path for include directories.
> Specifically, it has the line:
> CFLAGS = -Wall -I ../../../../../usr/include $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
>
> I believe this needs to reference kernel include files from the
> output directory, not the source directory.
>
> With the relative include directory path, the program userfaultfd.c
> gets compilation error like this:
>
> userfaultfd.c:267:21: error: 'UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC' undeclared here (not in a function)
> .expected_ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS_BASIC,
> ^
> userfaultfd.c: In function 'uffd_poll_thread':
> userfaultfd.c:529:8: error: 'UFFD_EVENT_FORK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> case UFFD_EVENT_FORK:
> ^
> userfaultfd.c:529:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> userfaultfd.c:531:18: error: 'union <anonymous>' has no member named 'fork'
> uffd = msg.arg.fork.ufd;
> ^
>
> 2) incomplete solution:
> I originally changed this line to read:
> CFLAGS = -Wall -I $(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/usr/include $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
>
Take a look at seccomp patch I sent out. Use the approach used
in this patch.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200313212404.24552-1-skhan@linuxfoundation.org/T/#u
> This works when the output directory is specified using KBUILD_OUTPUT,
> but not when the output directory is specified using O=
> I'm not sure what happens when the output directory is specified
> with a non-source-tree current working directory.
>
> In any event, while researching a proper solution to this, I found
> the following in tools/testing/selftests/Makefile:
>
> If compiling with ifneq ($(O),)
> BUILD := $(O)
> else
> ifneq ($(KBUILD_OUTPUT),)
> BUILD := $(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/kselftest
> else
> BUILD := $(shell pwd)
> DEFAULT_INSTALL_HDR_PATH := 1
> endif
> endif
>
> This doesn't seem right. It looks like the selftests Makefile treats a directory
> passed in using O= different from one specified using KBUILD_OUTPUT
> or the current working directory.
> In the KBUILD_OUTPUT case, you get an extra 'kselftest' directory layer
> that you don't get for the other two.
Are you using
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git
kernelci branch
This is fixed and that is the very first patch I sent.
I also applied the patch to
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next
branch
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-13 22:14 Bird, Tim
2020-03-13 22:28 ` shuah [this message]
2020-03-17 0:24 ` Bird, Tim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=598c2cfe-debd-3f4c-532f-f78422118451@kernel.org \
--to=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®