From: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:18:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59982fd2-fe5b-bd7d-40fd-0fba7de6687c@9elements.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230124174809.GA563974@roeck-us.net>
Hi
On 24-01-2023 11:18 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:40:19AM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> Add function pmbus get status that can be used to get both pmbus
>> specific status & regulator status
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> index 1b70cf3be313..12b662b91306 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> @@ -2735,64 +2735,16 @@ static const struct pmbus_status_category __maybe_unused pmbus_status_flag_map[]
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -{
>> - struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> - struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> - int ret;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> - ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
>> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> -
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> - return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
>> +static int pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsigned int *error)
>
> Moving this code outside the conditional without usage there will result
> in compile errors due to an unused function if compiled with REGULATOR
> disabled. While this will (hopefully) change in one of the later patches,
> it is still unacceptable because it may result in bisect failures.
>
Yes. With REGULATOR disabled. There is warning:
warning: ‘pmbus_get_flags’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
2739 | static int pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page,
unsigned int *error)
Will add maybe unused as below:
static int __maybe_unused pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8
page, unsigned int *error)
Let me know your view.
>> {
>> - struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> - struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> - ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
>> - PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
>> - enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
>> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -{
>> - return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -{
>> - return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
>> -{
>> - int i, status;
>> const struct pmbus_status_category *cat;
>> const struct pmbus_status_assoc *bit;
>> - struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> - struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> - struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(data->dev);
>> int func = data->info->func[page];
>> + int i, status, ret;
>>
>> - *flags = 0;
>> + *error = 0;
>
> You are making personal preference changes here. Maybe that is the reason
> why the patch looks that large. Please try to leave existing code alone.
> If there is a reason to change a variable name (or other cosmetic changes,
> like moving variable declarations around), do it in a separate patch which
> only does that, and explain why it is needed and/or makes sense.
Sure. Will do.
Best Regards,
Naresh
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>>
>> mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>>
>> @@ -2803,14 +2755,15 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>>
>> status = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, cat->reg);
>> if (status < 0) {
>> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> - return status;
>> + ret = status;
>> + goto unlock;
>> }
>>
>> for (bit = cat->bits; bit->pflag; bit++) {
>> if (status & bit->pflag)
>> - *flags |= bit->rflag;
>> + *error |= bit->rflag;
>> }
>> +
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2823,36 +2776,99 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>> * REGULATOR_ERROR_<foo>_WARN.
>> */
>> status = pmbus_get_status(client, page, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
>> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> - if (status < 0)
>> - return status;
>>
>> - if (pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(rdev)) {
>> + if (status < 0) {
>> + ret = status;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto unlock;
>> +
>> + if (ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON) {
>> if (status & PB_STATUS_OFF)
>> - *flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL;
>> + *error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL;
>>
>> if (status & PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N)
>> - *flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>> + *error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>> }
>> /*
>> * Unlike most other status bits, PB_STATUS_{IOUT_OC,VOUT_OV} are
>> * defined strictly as fault indicators (not warnings).
>> */
>> if (status & PB_STATUS_IOUT_OC)
>> - *flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT;
>> + *error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT;
>> if (status & PB_STATUS_VOUT_OV)
>> - *flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>> + *error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>>
>> /*
>> * If we haven't discovered any thermal faults or warnings via
>> * PMBUS_STATUS_TEMPERATURE, map PB_STATUS_TEMPERATURE to a warning as
>> * a (conservative) best-effort interpretation.
>> */
>> - if (!(*flags & (REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP | REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN)) &&
>> + if (!(*error & (REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP | REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN)) &&
>> (status & PB_STATUS_TEMPERATURE))
>> - *flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN;
>> + *error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN;
>>
>> - return 0;
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> + ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> + ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
>> + PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
>> + enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> + return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> + return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +
>> + return pmbus_get_flags(data, rdev_get_id(rdev), flags);
>> }
>>
>> static int pmbus_regulator_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> --
>> 2.38.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-25 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 6:40 [PATCH 1/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Generalize pmbus status flag map Naresh Solanki
2023-01-23 6:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status Naresh Solanki
2023-01-24 17:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-25 14:48 ` Naresh Solanki [this message]
2023-01-23 6:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Add interrupt support Naresh Solanki
2023-01-23 6:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Notify hwmon events Naresh Solanki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59982fd2-fe5b-bd7d-40fd-0fba7de6687c@9elements.com \
--to=naresh.solanki@9elements.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®