From: pheragu@codeaurora.org
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
apw@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tsoni@codeaurora.org, bryanh@codeaurora.org,
ckadabi@codeaurora.org, David Keitel <dkeitel@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Require commit text and warn on long commit text lines
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:20:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59a1b82fd854c9bf8a530bb053b718dc@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50a05aaf44e5f86cbf687863dadaa26b45debe2d.camel@perches.com>
On 2018-07-13 17:08, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 16:28 -0700, pheragu@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2018-07-13 14:46, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 14:40 -0700, Prakruthi Deepak Heragu wrote:
>> > > Commit text is almost always necessary to explain why a change is
>> > > needed.
>> >
>> > This bit seems sensible, but perhaps it should just count the
>> > number of lines after the end of email headers and before any
>> > Signed-off-by:/Signature line
>> >
>>
>> While committing the changes, one can just write the subject and not
>> write
>> the commit text at all. So, if we just count the lines between email
>> headers
>> and signed-off, we still do count lines which form the subject, but
>> the
>> commit text is still absent. Also, subject can be longer than one
>> line.
>> So,
>> just counting lines doesn't really guarantee the presence of commit
>> text.
>
> Not true.
> Look at $in_header_lines and $in_commit_log.
>
>> > > Also, warn on commit text lines longer than 75 characters. The commit
>> > > text
>> > > are indented and may wrap on a terminal if they are longer than 75
>> > > characters.
>> >
>> > This is already exists via
>> >
>> > # Check for line lengths > 75 in commit log, warn once
>> > if ($in_commit_log && !$commit_log_long_line &&
>> > length($line) > 75 &&
>> >
>>
>> True, but this patch points out every line of the commit text that is
>> exceeding the limit.
>
> Which is bad because things like dump_stack() are added in
> commit logs and those are already allowed to be > 75 chars.
>
> Anyway, something like this probably works. Please test.
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index b5c875d7132b..8b5f3dae31c9 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2240,6 +2240,7 @@ sub process {
> my $in_header_lines = $file ? 0 : 1;
> my $in_commit_log = 0; #Scanning lines before patch
> my $has_commit_log = 0; #Encountered lines before patch
> + my $commit_log_lines = 0; #Number of commit log lines
> my $commit_log_possible_stack_dump = 0;
> my $commit_log_long_line = 0;
> my $commit_log_has_diff = 0;
> @@ -2497,6 +2498,18 @@ sub process {
>
> $cnt_lines++ if ($realcnt != 0);
>
> +# Verify the existence of a commit log if appropriate
> +# 2 is used because a $signature is counted in $commit_log_lines
> + if ($in_commit_log) {
> + if ($line !~ /^\s*$/) {
> + $commit_log_lines++; #could be a $signature
> + }
> + } else if ($has_commit_log && $commit_log_lines < 2) {
> + WARN("COMMIT_MESSAGE",
> + "Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one\n");
> + $commit_log_lines = 2; #warn only once
> + }
> +
> # Check if the commit log has what seems like a diff which can confuse
> patch
> if ($in_commit_log && !$commit_log_has_diff &&
> (($line =~ m@^\s+diff\b.*a/[\w/]+@ &&
I checked all the cases that I mentioned before. The change you
suggested works
for every case. Would you take care of merging this fix?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-16 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 21:40 Prakruthi Deepak Heragu
2018-07-13 21:46 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-13 23:28 ` pheragu
2018-07-14 0:08 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-16 18:20 ` pheragu [this message]
2018-07-25 18:49 ` pheragu
2018-07-26 2:22 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn when a patch doesn't have a description Joe Perches
2018-07-26 10:08 ` Greg KH
2018-07-26 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-27 1:26 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59a1b82fd854c9bf8a530bb053b718dc@codeaurora.org \
--to=pheragu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ckadabi@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dkeitel@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome