From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Link Lin <linkl@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, prasin@google.com,
duenwen@google.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@openresty.com>,
jiaqiyan@google.com, ahwilkins@google.com,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio_balloon: fix Use-After-Free in page reporting during PM freeze
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:41:07 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59e3dae7-a203-2e1d-3b65-875b7e0e122b@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALUx4KQ=bYTpDoDAZ+iVb7Ehaa0LmyPDsEWk3xFFmTVYKrpAUA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 9 Jul 2026, Link Lin wrote:
> > > Fix this by:
> > > 1. Unregistering page reporting in virtballoon_freeze() prior to calling
> > > remove_common(). This clears the RCU pr_dev_info pointer and flushes/
> > > cancels prdev->work on system_wq via cancel_delayed_work_sync().
> > > 2. Re-registering page reporting in virtballoon_restore() after the
> > > virtqueues are re-initialized and virtio_device_ready() has been called.
> > > 3. Unwinding virtqueue initialization via remove_common() in
> > > virtballoon_restore() if page_reporting_register() fails.
> >
> > AI review thinks the patch didn't do the above:
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709224330.946683-1-linkl@google.com
>
> The AI reviewer might not have parsed the entirety of the fix I proposed.
> The patch submitted definitely includes the changes to virtballoon_restore()
> for steps 2 and 3 (re-registering page reporting and unwinding init_vqs
> on failure). It seems the AI failed to parse the diff correctly. See:
>
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING)) {
> + ret = page_reporting_register(&vb->pr_dev_info);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_remove_vqs;
> + }
> +
> if (towards_target(vb))
> virtballoon_changed(vdev);
> update_balloon_size(vb);
> return 0;
> +
> +out_remove_vqs:
> + remove_common(vb);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> > It also might have found a couple of pre-existing bugs in there.
>
> Indeed. Regarding the first pre-existing bug found by the AI (leaving the
> OOM notifier registered during suspend, leading to a UAF if memory pressure
> spikes during S4 hibernation):
>
> I actually addressed this in the commit message:
>
> "(Note: The OOM Notifier and Shrinker/Free Page Hinting features suffer
> from an identical lifecycle flaw and are also vulnerable to UAFs during
> S4 hibernation when memory pressure spikes. This patch focuses on Free
> Page Reporting, which runs periodically, to ensure clean backports to
> stable kernels)."
>
> Regarding the second pre-existing bug the AI flagged (leaving uncancelled
> works on system_freezable_wq if virtballoon_restore fails on the cold path):
> the AI is correct that this asynchronous work cancellation failure exists.
>
> Since these are separate, pre-existing lifecycle bugs, would you prefer I
> roll fixes for the OOM notifier, shrinker/free page hinting, and work
> cancellations into a v2 of this patch, or submit them as a separate patch
> series to keep the stable backports clean?
>
I think it would be best to have separate patches for each fix; Andrew,
please correct me if you'd prefer one patch to address everything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 22:43 Link Lin
2026-07-09 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-10 0:45 ` Link Lin
2026-07-13 19:41 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2026-07-13 19:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-14 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-14 13:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-14 18:05 ` Link Lin
2026-07-17 3:02 ` Link Lin
2026-07-14 18:21 ` David Rientjes
2026-07-14 18:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59e3dae7-a203-2e1d-3b65-875b7e0e122b@google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=ahwilkins@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=ammarfaizi2@openresty.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=duenwen@google.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=linkl@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=prasin@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox