From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: "wbx@uclibc-ng.org" <wbx@uclibc-ng.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: Enable machine_desc->init_per_cpu for non-SMP configs
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:26:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59f6fc647175e3f22f530fc4497cc4104af355e7.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee663800-7f72-c310-2a65-d8b52a811f15@synopsys.com>
Hi Vineet,
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 09:46 -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 11/29/2017 12:21 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > As of today we assumed that "machine_desc->init_per_cpu" calls
> > are only usable on SMP systems when we want to run some piece of
> > code on early boot for each and every core, I guess assumption was
> > we have "machine_desc->init_early" for single-core cases where
> > the one and only master core can do all the things.
> >
> > But it turned out for platforms which might be both UP and SMP it
> > might be benificial to use "init_per_cpu" for both UP and SMP cases
> > with which we achieve 2 things simultaneously:
> > 1) Exactly the same one code will be used for UP&SMP for
> > things required to be done on each an every core regardless if it's
> > a master and the only core in UP system or any other slave core in SMP
> > setup.
> > 1) There will be no "ifdef CONFIG_SMP" around "init_per_cpu".
> >
>
> Seems fine to me. However this needs to go with the actual platform change which
> needs it.
Well for example this might get in the way of building kernel for HSDK with
CONFIG_SMP disabled which is IMHO quite valid case in terms of testing
code-base compiled with no CONFIG_SMP (something Waldemar was up to).
Is it a strong enough reason for that patch to be applied?
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 8:21 Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-30 17:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-06-14 22:26 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2018-06-20 23:11 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59f6fc647175e3f22f530fc4497cc4104af355e7.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=wbx@uclibc-ng.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®