From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88FC4BA06 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA6C2468D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728567AbgB0Itg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:49:36 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:51115 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728467AbgB0Itg (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:49:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f197.google.com ([209.85.210.197]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7ErO-0006X2-2A for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:49:34 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-f197.google.com with SMTP id d127so1597075pfa.7 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:49:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yuo2Bfz0FnDnLaB5WH/eEhmv3YLgZdUk0gQwtfu9d3g=; b=VpwZob0uGfvw+AtFaLmW9OszyFDvAwPlSpxlzkAM0nFfrLdZtkNVCm2Sx+prR8wCa5 c2odTxYPlFloZcDxzNVHAlviL6Xh2ZpVhjzZnewNTNX0UX4eYql06Xav09nlXs7Z5Alj 7ux+5vczVNeaSx8tjj3PVjdd5rXsu5T9h0c0Ks4wwMmAiUKo0mdhbWf5HPGdmba2t0ln Hi9ezsqZEHs2BU9h8oVfBdnVUIxi+Vm9WXLdxEVLHdbHpFyDFn7+532ka5KbThnrrw/X gU5doz2QHGUtg9Hqr4jWwZjKqzJAi2r98L4vI/9vyZ0IB8HhBdyk5gRRixZTAbqYOof8 Y4Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkzDjv4YgqwpjcigbrFWD3MZmhawyLtaeCuqJqYP6lOpaEjBTo nfHV3IhKyPbprQArD3yITYVsWC9ifY+G6v33AOPPIyDrL+aycKoHGnZ5DcAUxKOZ/e3LqgVL4yq 6MbSzCCS7GLY1WqBsPDnGT5JBwLzIwggoRSTbZO64jA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:14a:: with SMTP id em10mr3765902pjb.4.1582793372751; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:49:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPxvvV8ywaszpVzifTAV8XbWtdxoYItNFUu7k/B5/ayjIFnd4TKFAsokDu1IEjAQLGJ/q09A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:14a:: with SMTP id em10mr3765879pjb.4.1582793372445; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:49:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from 2001-b011-380f-3214-6497-1af0-2c80-300f.dynamic-ip6.hinet.net (2001-b011-380f-3214-6497-1af0-2c80-300f.dynamic-ip6.hinet.net. [2001:b011:380f:3214:6497:1af0:2c80:300f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t63sm6176198pfb.70.2020.02.27.00.49.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:49:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: Re: SFP+ support for 8168fp/8117 From: Kai-Heng Feng In-Reply-To: <9AAC75D4-B04F-49CD-BBB9-11AE3382E4D8@canonical.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:49:29 +0800 Cc: Heiner Kallweit , Andrew Lunn , Linux Netdev List , Kernel development list , Anthony Wong , Jason Yen Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <5A21808E-C9DA-44BF-952B-4A5077B52E9B@canonical.com> References: <2D8F5FFE-3EC3-480B-9D15-23CACE5556DF@canonical.com> <20200102152143.GB1397@lunn.ch> <02F7CBDE-B877-481C-A5AF-2F4CBF830A2C@canonical.com> <80E9C881-91C8-4F29-B9CE-652F9EE0B018@canonical.com> <995bddbc4f9d48cbb3a289a7e9799f15@realtek.com> <12EA7285-06D7-44D3-B033-4F52A06123CC@canonical.com> <9AAC75D4-B04F-49CD-BBB9-11AE3382E4D8@canonical.com> To: Hau X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hau, > On Feb 19, 2020, at 22:48, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > Hi Hau, > >> On Feb 19, 2020, at 22:22, Hau wrote: > > [snipped] > >> >> Hi Kai-Heng, >> >> Attached file is r8168 that I have add SFP+ support for rtl8168fp. If possible, please give it a try. > > I've already tested r8168 and it does support SFP+. > > What we are discussing here is to support this chip properly in mainline kernel. > > This is what we've discussed so far: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2D8F5FFE-3EC3-480B-9D15-23CACE5556DF@canonical.com/ Is there anything you can share so we can support this chip properly in upstream? Kai-Heng > > Kai-Heng