From: piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>,
"Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/9p/trans_virtio.c: replace mutex_lock with spin_lock to protect 'virtio_chan_list'
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:26:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B4FF6DB.1040101@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718095420.GA28377@nautica>
Hi Dominique,
On 2018/7/18 17:54, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> piaojun wrote on Wed, Jul 18, 2018:
>> spin_lock is more effective for short time protection than mutex_lock, as
>> mutex lock may cause process sleep and wake up which consume much cpu
>> time.
>
> That's not a fast path operation, I don't mind changing things but I'd
> like to understand why - these functions are only ever called at unmount
> time or when something happens on the virtio bus (probe will happen on
> probing on the pci bus and I'm not too sure on remove but probably pci
> removal i.e. basically never?)
>
> I don't see why this wouldn't work, but I won't take this without a
> (good?) reason.
>
virtio_9p_lock is responsable for protecting virtio_chan_list which has 3
operation:
1. Add a virtio chan to virtio_chan_list. This will happen when we insmod
9pnet_virtio.ko:
p9_virtio_probe
--list_add_tail(&chan->chan_list, &virtio_chan_list);
2. Remove a virtio chan. This will happen when remnod 9pnet_virtio.ko:
p9_virtio_remove
--list_del(&chan->chan_list);
3. Find a unused virtio chan when mount 9p:
mount
--p9_virtio_create
--list_for_each_entry(chan, &virtio_chan_list, chan_list)
Multi mount process will compete for virtio_9p_lock when finding unused
virtio chan, in which case mutex lock will cause process sleep and wake
up. I think this a waste of CPU time. So we could use spin lock to avoid
this.
Thanks,
Jun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-19 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 8:06 piaojun
2018-07-18 9:54 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-07-19 2:26 ` piaojun [this message]
2018-07-19 3:36 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-07-19 7:44 ` piaojun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B4FF6DB.1040101@huawei.com \
--to=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=rminnich@sandia.gov \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome