mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Coddington <ben.coddington@hammerspace.com>
To: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] nfsd: layout recall and lease break fixes
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:25:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5E58C7FF-4202-4F10-BAB7-B027292AD070@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015-nfsd-layout-recall-v3-0-ba3269f8ca22@samsung.com>

On 15 Oct 2026, at 0:15, Daejun Park via B4 Relay wrote:

> nfsd polls a client that has accepted a CB_LAYOUTRECALL by sending the
> callback again every 10 ms, with the stateid of the first callback. A
> Linux client from v6.8 on answers the repeat with NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
> and nfsd takes that as a failed recall. So a client that needs more than
> 10 ms to return a layout has the layout revoked and the fence path run.
> With the block layout that client loses data it has written and synced,
> with the SCSI layout it is cut off from the device.

[...]

Patch 5's point that the Linux client doesn't report NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT
on LAYOUTCOMMIT - nfs4_layoutcommit_done() throws it away, so fsync()
returns 0 while the block layout writes into unwritten extents are gone.  I
think thats reachable today through the existing recall failure path, so
it would be a client bug - I'm going to see if I can fix that.

Otherwise, this looks good to me.  For the series:

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@hammerspace.com>

Ben

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-15  4:15 Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] nfsd: fail a LAYOUTGET in progress when the layout lease is broken Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] nfsd: answer NFS4ERR_DELAY instead of waiting for a layout recall Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] nfsd: make the time limit of a layout recall work Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] nfsd: run the fence script when a block layout lease break times out Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] nfsd: end a layout recall once a lease break has fenced the client Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] nfsd: keep polling a layout recall answered with NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] nfsd: do not fence a client for a layout recall with no layouts left Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 20:25 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5E58C7FF-4202-4F10-BAB7-B027292AD070@hammerspace.com \
    --to=ben.coddington@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®