From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
To: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>, <hare@suse.de>,
<jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<robert.w.love@intel.com>, <Neerav.Parikh@intel.com>,
<Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: fcoe: add missed kfree() in an error path
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:13:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5F100C39.5070503@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1fa9e60b559b6bf3a37ef5a6aef2bd7bd6e1681.camel@redhat.com>
On 2020/7/14 1:53, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> See below.
>
> On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 20:05 +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
>> fcoe_fdmi_info() misses to call kfree() in an error path.
>> Add a label 'free_fdmi' and jump to it.
>>
>> Fixes: f07d46bbc9ba ("fcoe: Fix smatch warning in fcoe_fdmi_info
>> function")
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
>> index 25dae9f0b205..a63057a03772 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
>> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static void fcoe_fdmi_info(struct fc_lport
>> *lport, struct net_device *netdev)
>> if (rc) {
>> printk(KERN_INFO "fcoe: Failed to retrieve FDMI
>> "
>> "information from netdev.\n");
>> - return;
>> + goto free_fdmi;
>> }
>>
>> snprintf(fc_host_serial_number(lport->host),
>> @@ -868,6 +868,7 @@ static void fcoe_fdmi_info(struct fc_lport
>> *lport, struct net_device *netdev)
>>
>> /* Enable FDMI lport states */
>> lport->fdmi_enabled = 1;
>> +free_fdmi:
>> kfree(fdmi);
>> } else {
>> lport->fdmi_enabled = 0;
>
> Normally I would like to see goto labels for error paths outside
> conditionals and at the end of the function.
I agree.
In this case it would
> seem to be cleaner to put an else { } clause in the if (rc) above
> around the snprintf() calls.
It is ok with me. v1 is also a simpler way.
+Hannes, Which is preferable?
Thanks
>
> -Ewan
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-09 12:05 Jing Xiangfeng
2020-07-13 17:53 ` Ewan D. Milne
2020-07-16 8:13 ` Jing Xiangfeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5F100C39.5070503@huawei.com \
--to=jingxiangfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=Neerav.Parikh@intel.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=robert.w.love@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome