mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
To: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
Cc: <maz@kernel.org>, <oupton@kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <corbet@lwn.net>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	<yangjinqian1@huawei.com>, <caijian11@h-partners.com>,
	<liuyonglong@huawei.com>, <tangchengchang@huawei.com>,
	<yezhenyu2@huawei.com>, <yubihong@huawei.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	<kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
	<rdunlap@infradead.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl for dirty-bitmap mode
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 18:27:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a096cca-713a-4449-83dc-c763dc06c085@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auioRICO9Frhk-zT@LeoBrasDK>



On 11/2/2026 11:12 PM, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 06:36:53PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
>> In dirty-bitmap mode, a larger HDBSS buffer lets the guest dirty more
>> pages between VM exits, at the cost of memory. The default of one page
>> per vCPU is a reasonable starting point, so allow userspace to opt
>> into a larger buffer via KVM_CAP_ARM_HDBSS_BUFFER_SIZE.
>>
>> The size is specified in bytes through KVM_ENABLE_CAP and must be a
>> power of two in [PAGE_SIZE, SZ_2M]: the upper bound is the largest
>> HDBSSBR_EL2.SZ encoding, and the power-of-two requirement matches the
>> buddy allocator. It must be set before any vCPU is created: -EINVAL
>> after vCPUs exist, -EBUSY if already set.
>>
>> The capability is rejected in dirty-ring mode, where the size is
>> pinned by kvm_arch_dirty_ring_size_updated().
>>
>> KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION returns the configured size for a VM, or SZ_2M
>> when queried globally with a NULL kvm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c     | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index 5a7046acb62e..eadbf3a88d31 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/kvm.h>
>>   #include <linux/kvm_irqfd.h>
>>   #include <linux/irqbypass.h>
>> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>>   #include <linux/sched/stat.h>
>>   #include <linux/psci.h>
>>   #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>> @@ -203,6 +204,31 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
>>   		r = 0;
>>   		set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EXIT_SEA, &kvm->arch.flags);
>>   		break;
>> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_HDBSS_BUFFER_SIZE: {
>> +		u64 size = cap->args[0];
>> +
>> +		if (!system_supports_hdbss())
>> +			break;
>> +		if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
>> +			break;
>> +		if (size < KVM_ARM_HDBSS_DEFAULT_SIZE ||
>> +		    size > KVM_ARM_HDBSS_MAX_SIZE)
>> +			break;
>> +		if (!is_power_of_2(size))
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> +		if (kvm->created_vcpus) {
>> +			r = -EINVAL;
>> +		} else if (kvm->arch.hdbss_buffer_size) {
>> +			r = -EBUSY;
>> +		} else {
>> +			kvm->arch.hdbss_buffer_size = size;
>> +			r = 0;
>> +		}
>> +		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>>   	default:
>>   		break;
>>   	}
>> @@ -500,6 +526,14 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>>   		else
>>   			r = KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT;
>>   		break;
>> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_HDBSS_BUFFER_SIZE:
>> +		if (!system_supports_hdbss())
>> +			r = 0;
>> +		else if (kvm)
>> +			r = kvm->arch.hdbss_buffer_size ?: KVM_ARM_HDBSS_DEFAULT_SIZE;
> 
> This whole thing of allowing hdbss_buf_size to be set only once makes
> everything more complex. Why do we have this limitation again?
> 
> I mean, if we want to restrict size changes after the first hdbss buffer
> gets allocated, it makes sense, other than that, I would like to understand
> the reason for that.
> 
> Thanks!
> Leo

Hi Leo,

You're right, I re-examined the whole flow and the "set once"
restriction isn't actually needed. I'll remove it.

Thanks,
Tian


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 10:36 [PATCH v5 00/15] KVM: arm64: FEAT_HDBSS support for stage-2 dirty tracking Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] KVM: arm64: pgtables: Change write bit from S2AP_W to DBM Tian Zheng
2026-09-30  0:25   ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-30  2:44     ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 15:02       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-29  7:08         ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DIRTY Tian Zheng
2026-09-30  0:35   ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-30  2:57     ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: arm64: Introduce a dedicated walker for stage2 write-protect Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_REQ_RELOAD_STAGE2 Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: arm64: Harvest stage-2 dirty state into the host folio account Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:05   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-29 14:02     ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-30 12:24       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06  3:16         ` Tian Zheng
2026-11-06 12:04           ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_HDBSS Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:12   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-30  2:53     ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-30 14:15       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS per-vCPU buffer management Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:27   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-30  3:47     ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-30 14:47       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06  8:49         ` Tian Zheng
2026-11-06 15:21           ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: arm64: Flush the HDBSS buffer on VM exit Tian Zheng
2026-10-27 18:13   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-10-30  4:57     ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-30 16:52       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06  9:02         ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] KVM: arm64: Handle HDBSS faults Tian Zheng
2026-11-02 14:34   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06  9:44     ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] KVM: Add kvm_arch_dirty_ring_size_updated() hook Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: arm64: Reserve dirty ring space for the HDBSS buffer Tian Zheng
2026-11-02 14:54   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 10:36     ` Tian Zheng
2026-11-06 15:36       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 10:58     ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] KVM: arm64: Derive the VM hardware dirty mode from dirty logging Tian Zheng
2026-11-02 15:03   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 10:46     ` Tian Zheng
2026-11-06 15:37       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl for dirty-bitmap mode Tian Zheng
2026-11-02 15:12   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-11-06 10:27     ` Tian Zheng [this message]
2026-11-06 15:37       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] KVM: arm64: Document HDBSS buffer size ioctl Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl interface test Tian Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a096cca-713a-4449-83dc-c763dc06c085@huawei.com \
    --to=zhengtian10@huawei.com \
    --cc=caijian11@h-partners.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=leo.bras@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangjinqian1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yezhenyu2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yubihong@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®