Re: [PATCH] vfio/type1: fix vaddr_get_pfns() return in vfio_pin_page_external()

[Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>]

Hi Daniel,

[+Cc iommu mail list]

This patch looks good to me. (but I don't test it too.)

Thanks,
Keqian

On 2021/3/9 1:24, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> vaddr_get_pfns() now returns the positive number of pfns successfully
> gotten instead of zero.  vfio_pin_page_external() might return 1 to
> vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(), which will treat it as an error, if
> vaddr_get_pfns() is successful but vfio_pin_page_external() doesn't
> reach vfio_lock_acct().
> 
> Fix it up in vfio_pin_page_external().  Found by inspection.
> 
> Fixes: be16c1fd99f4 ("vfio/type1: Change success value of vaddr_get_pfn()")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
> ---
> 
> I couldn't test this due to lack of hardware.
> 
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 4bb162c1d649..2a0e3b3ce206 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -785,7 +785,12 @@ static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	ret = vaddr_get_pfns(mm, vaddr, 1, dma->prot, pfn_base, pages);
> -	if (ret == 1 && do_accounting && !is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base)) {
> +	if (ret != 1)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (do_accounting && !is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base)) {
>  		ret = vfio_lock_acct(dma, 1, true);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
> @@ -797,6 +802,7 @@ static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +out:
>  	mmput(mm);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> base-commit: 144c79ef33536b4ecb4951e07dbc1f2b7fa99d32
>