From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net (004.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07EB42E267B; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751991543; cv=none; b=lLLZnhpO+cziYRhuK2kEQCWls4lcRayoCZVTLWr3Z+DogljwVtDf6HpyejG7Kyzy3ZOiueMfUcd1KGenqzSdmHo/xg7P4oTBAnaECt/O1uNScFo31HGwuy5sGYLQ6ZsTte0fFdsxSsl6AhjnfxiyKbeG1AqnSpigIAfpqog79bY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751991543; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e3FdwPV865GyTPKY9x8B8DZNi5qFQHQuKJK8ObR4GfE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jw1dvbHaWaT8A1Xvhas2QPvesU0+LMddfssee7YAdkam6blXmnMa7gQs4IIvj8L3PP2QxjdzAv8B/B7gw/xFQRdAfOGIdY8aVoNMdoFvOVib2WlH96nGD+sk2vTPwoyPtOjy1cpMV6FO1kl0TSbadLayJUXIeAeRGullvOaR5UU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=jiOE6R0B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="jiOE6R0B" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bc5rv4zV0zm0ysk; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:18:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1751991532; x=1754583533; bh=Z6zaoDVVAFylatkQsFa0+IMT D4ZZVRePNO8su5n17Wc=; b=jiOE6R0BdshHVf3AN8enPxfoDOUVSv2AYUBuNZEq iwZjUhASowKl8S+odUwGzkz9c2I8HZbBHuf2kDPz4b6CAufi9xD2LR6ronO7E18P Uxr0SSddmFAxM+IQz7d3V6kaQCpNlwzcCXYotI2EJBxO8Ufx0hn6y2Pp4ibx4fbR jfFAPKy3CAHPfHWYMqkRWqm8i8CBWSJK7GuAdLx4gHFO6CK8uhMJq+VFhmbWueyY 3CxJmm8YIagqxrq+YU5a0/oc2ONiaPHuPvACphaWll+rQXvXDnpwWPyYnK78qYFg c99YXdIPC1ZC0qV6vNd+ZnTu5C/ItiifkAGu6qBY5AsCEQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (004.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id cRmgfnEHxOWT; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bc5rh4yxrzm0yQx; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5a1bd678-c935-4c1b-812d-a249f1caebb7@acm.org> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 09:18:42 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec_mask for HW major version >= 6 To: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Nitin Rawat Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, ebiggers@google.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Bao D. Nguyen" References: <20250707210300.561-1-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> <20250707210300.561-2-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/8/25 12:53 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 02:32:58AM GMT, Nitin Rawat wrote: >> From: "Bao D. Nguyen" > > Nit: Please use consistent subject prefix: > > scsi: ufs: qcom: > > Maybe we should get rid of 'scsi' prefix since the ufs code is now moved > outside of drivers/scsi/. Bart? Dropping the "scsi:" prefix sounds good to me because this prefix makes patch subject lines a bit long. Thanks, Bart.