From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f48.google.com (mail-qv1-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7CA440E for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 03:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=landley.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=landley.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=landley-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@landley-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="ZCrzf3hA" Received: by mail-qv1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67f7bd86cafso5639176d6.0 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:45:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landley-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1704426333; x=1705031133; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O8c3ESdi0IpZK01xiWxgeJ4UdiYi9dbopai5vRQAmfM=; b=ZCrzf3hAxojmPURXjyhmjP55vobVpOhNUc+p71kECADzYXsC/m78kAwcFOOuZ2k5SL +D/CJXn8PDyOT1UgdUw+akNGUaIhYHVAvFxlZfZg9FKnb5VIqGpvoaWof03eiYLsVun5 +cZMl+K8A56Mq6MCr3uNK5Mja0lNk1Z4pv52W8CJXqG14IfYgw9bCmEBfV9VjOGsYMic 1VblRaUocYmokkMkJbt3q6AolZsc7neXzpovAjECE0gAbpSrdEHKQApF8OW+MMMiaGMc F1pFZQ6v+v7HHaOlx3KTJ0r8vVVRNS+1xVEyHHhFyv3rOAaWu+nF3rjBwWAgIMBp/EAn 4aaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704426333; x=1705031133; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O8c3ESdi0IpZK01xiWxgeJ4UdiYi9dbopai5vRQAmfM=; b=Qbg2yCOHJlxRCLz7D9N7hVeoYCMHtAjKfttC2EZkKuwuU8fGDASz71fKXarDR2jVs3 UozYb28C3Cg69Vpz3L8Wy31T9sDgoHGbVJM8Cv/uTO21JTNLHDe1JNPtJAQpurzhPYTh BXg+vgUFGlzJ3IlRMdN+Hm6Up1PMfrUBpjzy6wf2EBZhDoEN/eRIvpEgESHx5AR76ck5 VHBmQBhSHEoR/tzZc5v3wNQnuOOO9XlS9vWE5Q0mXZuivgdZ2U3Hvp5hufCUqHfdkhth FKlcwbJb7BVcpxoSIAhEBJSMJ+Z4TDzworaXDaNvUUw4Q1Rf6zePYy6OcEoZRwYLFt5D gN8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzb3baAwr30jF7d3C0C0gxQs6MLgIzHbuL3lIgZxEGi4Ltcnt3G cSrRyY7o2OCyuExDZL7vwMWEhI6NHJDj/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFbkA2aPU2aI39vcY4LyLCBENRrl6F3tJNOaay03B3PVHlOWcvhr88DceJ6bvJ0p4z3390ecg== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5742:0:b0:680:d233:9d7 with SMTP id q2-20020ad45742000000b00680d23309d7mr1637485qvx.125.1704426332729; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:45:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.32.83] ([198.232.126.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n12-20020ad444ac000000b0067f75dbf08fsm307623qvt.11.2024.01.04.19.45.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:45:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:52:00 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP Content-Language: en-US To: Cyril Hrubis , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Petr Vorel , ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang , Andrea Cervesato , Greg Ungerer , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christophe Lyon , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM , linux-riscv , Linux-sh list References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> From: Rob Landley In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! >> I am not sure I agree with this series. >> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for >> not noticing when more breakage is introduced. >> >> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP? > > As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a > decade, Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do. Rob