From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/entry_fred: don't set up KVM IRQs if KVM is disabled
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:31:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a332064-0a26-4bb9-8a3e-c99604d2d919@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a61b113c-613c-41df-80a5-b061889edfdf@zytor.com>
On 2/16/24 03:10, Xin Li wrote:
> On 2/15/2024 11:55 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> +Paolo and Stephen
>>
>> FYI, there's a build failure in -next due to a collision between
>> kvm/next and
>> tip/x86/fred. The above makes everything happy.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024, Max Kellermann wrote:
>>> When KVM is disabled, the POSTED_INTR_* macros do not exist, and the
>>> build fails.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 14619d912b65 ("x86/fred: FRED entry/exit and dispatch code")
>>> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c b/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
>>> index ac120cbdaaf2..660b7f7f9a79 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
>>> @@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ static idtentry_t
>>> sysvec_table[NR_SYSTEM_VECTORS] __ro_after_init = {
>>> SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR, irq_work),
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
>>> SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_ipi),
>>> SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi),
>>> SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi),
>>> +#endif
>>> };
>>> static bool fred_setup_done __initdata;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>
> We want to minimize #ifdeffery (which is why we didn't add any to
> sysvec_table[]), would it be better to simply remove "#if
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)" around the the POSTED_INTR_* macros from the
> Linux-next tree?
>
> BTW, kvm_posted_intr_*() are defined to NULL if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM).
It is intentional that KVM-related things are compiled out completely
if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM), because then it's also not necessary to have
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi NULL
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi NULL
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi NULL
in arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h. The full conflict resultion is
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c b/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
index ac120cbdaaf2..660b7f7f9a79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
@@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ static idtentry_t sysvec_table[NR_SYSTEM_VECTORS] __ro_after_init = {
SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR, irq_work),
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_ipi),
SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi),
SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi),
+#endif
};
static bool fred_setup_done __initdata;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
index 749c7411d2f1..758f6a2838a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
@@ -745,10 +745,6 @@ DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR, sysvec_irq_work);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi);
-#else
-# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi NULL
-# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi NULL
-# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi NULL
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
and it seems to be a net improvement to me. The #ifs match in
the .h and .c files, and there are no unnecessary initializers
in the sysvec_table.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-15 13:36 Max Kellermann
2024-02-15 18:23 ` Xin Li
2024-02-15 19:30 ` Max Kellermann
2024-02-15 19:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-16 2:10 ` Xin Li
2024-02-16 6:31 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-02-16 17:41 ` Xin Li
2024-02-16 17:47 ` Xin Li
2024-02-16 21:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-16 23:00 ` Max Kellermann
2024-02-17 0:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-17 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-17 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-16 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-16 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a332064-0a26-4bb9-8a3e-c99604d2d919@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®