From: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.15-rc5-git3] hpet.c causes FC4 GCC 4.0.2 to bomb with unrecognizable insn
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:50:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a4c581d0512171250j1572c086j4fa56c41d19fa0ae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051217123636.cdd53270.akpm@osdl.org>
On 12/17/05, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > CC drivers/char/hpet.o
> > drivers/char/hpet.c: In function `hpet_calibrate':
> > drivers/char/hpet.c:803: Unrecognizable insn:
> > (insn/i 95 270 264 (parallel[
> > (set (reg:SI 0 eax)
> > (asm_operands ("") ("=a") 0[
> > (reg:DI 1 edx)
> > ]
> > [
> > (asm_input:DI ("A"))
> > ] ("drivers/char/hpet.c") 452))
> > (set (reg:SI 1 edx)
> > (asm_operands ("") ("=d") 1[
> > (reg:DI 1 edx)
> > ]
> > [
> > (asm_input:DI ("A"))
> > ] ("drivers/char/hpet.c") 452))
> > (clobber (reg:QI 19 dirflag))
> > (clobber (reg:QI 18 fpsr))
> > (clobber (reg:QI 17 flags))
> > ] ) -1 (insn_list 92 (nil))
> > (nil))
> > drivers/char/hpet.c:803: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
> > make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hpet.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/char] Error 2
> > make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> >
>
> Same compiler works OK here, so it's presumably "fixed" by some some good
> .config luck.
>
> If we can find a decent workaround in-kernel it's worth putting it in.
> It's quite possible that inlined hpet_time_div() - please try uninlining
> it.
>
Coincidence - I was about to post the fact that my earlier report
was due to a pilot error (TM).
I had installed the compat-gcc packages due to legacy software
which expected /usr/bin/gcc to be the FC2 2.96 GCC, then I
forgot to point /usr/bin/gcc back to FC4 4.0.2 GCC.
So there is a compiler which bombs, but it's this one:
[asuardi@sandman ~]$ /usr/bin/gcc296 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux7/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 2.96-126)
Sorry for the false alarm about GCC 4.0.2. According to the
current Documentation/Changes the 2.96 compiler seems to
be expected to build these kernels, so perhaps there still is
something to be looked into.
If anyone is interested I can try uninlining hpet_time_div()
and rebuild with 2.96 then report back.
Thanks,
--alessandro
"Somehow all you ever need is, never really quite enough, you know"
(Bruce Springsteen - "Reno")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-17 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-13 13:07 Alessandro Suardi
2005-12-17 20:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-17 20:50 ` Alessandro Suardi [this message]
2005-12-17 21:33 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a4c581d0512171250j1572c086j4fa56c41d19fa0ae@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alessandro.suardi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®