From: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: YongSu Yoo <yongsuyoo0215@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dvb_ringbuffer: Return -EFAULT if copy fails
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 09:54:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a51136c-43d6-10ea-e60d-f8ebf3b19dfc@nfschina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230526114539.0520dcbf@sal.lan>
On 2023/5/26 18:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 24 May 2023 10:20:38 +0300
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> escreveu:
>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 01:20:27PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
>>> It's confusing about the comment on function declaration.
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * dvb_ringbuffer_write_user - Writes a buffer received via a user
>>> pointer
>>>
>>> ..........
>>>
>>> * Return: number of bytes transferred or -EFAULT
>>>
>>> But the function Only returns the number of bytes transferred.
>>>
>>> Maybe the comment should be modified because it never returns -EFAULT.
>> To be honest, I think that -EFAULT is probably a better return. But
>> there is no way we could apply the patch with that commit message. The
>> commit message doesn't explain the problem for the user or why returning
>> the number of bytes copied is not correct in this case.
>>
>> I think that maybe it's not too late to change this to return -EFAULT,
>> but it would have been easier to make the change in 2014 before there
>> were many users. Also it would be easier if you were testing this on
>> real hardware.
> It is too late to change the API here, as this could break userspace.
>
> Basically, DVB subsystem normally works with a Kernel-implemented ringbuffer
> that transfers MPEG TS data between kernelspace/userspace. The size is
> set via an ioctl (DMX_SET_BUFFER_SIZE). By the way, such uAPI is older
> than 2014. It was added upstream on Kernel 2.6.
>
> The buffer size is usually big. For instance, dvbv5-zap uses:
>
> #define DVB_BUF_SIZE (4096 * 8 * 188)
>
> The normal operation is that data will be received from a MPEG-TS
> stream, although it is also possible to send data on cable TV, when
> using dvb net interface.
>
> While on several boards, the hardware<->kernel transfer happens on
> 188-bytes packages, there are some hardware out there where the
> data passed from/to kernel is not 188-bytes aligned.
>
> The normal operation (receiving a TV broadcast) means that the Kernel
> will be filling a ringbuffer containing the data passed from the
> hardware. The size of the such buffer is adjusted via DMX_SET_BUFFER_SIZE
> and contains MPEG TS packets of 188-bytes. Userspace will be in an
> endless loop that will be waiting for data to arrive at the ringbuffer,
> copying received data its own userspace buffer. If the buffer is not set
> to a multiple of 188, it should be up to userspace to handle incomplete
> frames. The same occurs if the data is 204-bytes aligned. Btw, userspace
> can detect the packet size, based on the frame content.
>
> On such example, if a ringbuffer transfer would be passing 1554 bytes,
> it means that 8 MPEG-TS frames are complete, and that 50 bytes of the
> next frame was also transfered from/to userspace.
>
> It should be up to userspace to ensure that those extra 50 bytes will
> be probably taken into account by the application and ensure that the
> remaining 138 bytes will be handled at the next from/to userspace
> data transfer.
>
> Not the best API, but any change there will break userspace.
>
> In particular, this patch will completely break transfers if the
> buffer size is not 188-bytes aligned.
>
> so,
>
> NACK.
>
> Su,
>
> Did you find any real problem with this? On what hardware/application?
There is no real problem.
I understand, and this patch is wrong.
Sorry to bother you.
Su Hui
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-24 1:27 Su Hui
2023-05-24 4:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-05-24 4:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-05-24 5:20 ` Su Hui
2023-05-24 7:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-05-24 8:23 ` Longsuhui
2023-05-26 10:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-05-29 1:08 ` Longsuhui
2023-05-29 1:54 ` Su Hui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a51136c-43d6-10ea-e60d-f8ebf3b19dfc@nfschina.com \
--to=suhui@nfschina.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=yongsuyoo0215@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®