From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Yu Hao <yhao016@ucr.edu>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in __might_resched
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:51:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a994a13-d1f2-87a8-09e4-a877e65ed166@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+UBctCZok5FSQ=LPRA+A-jocW=L8FuMVZ_7MNqhh483P5yN8A@mail.gmail.com>
On 18. 04. 23, 5:44, Yu Hao wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We found the following issue using syzkaller on Linux v6.2.0.
> A similar bug was found in function `n_hdlc_tty_wakeup` before.
> (https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/XAyZCUO-eAY/m/Lpj5SzDNAwAJ)
> Now it is found in a different caller `gsmld_write`.
> It needs to fix the bug in `gsmld_write` again.
>
> The full report including the C reproducer:
> https://gist.github.com/ZHYfeng/eb410de5d7aec253d8c83cf34e628d6a
>
> The brief report is below:
>
> Syzkaller hit 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in
> __might_resched' bug.
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/printk/printk.c:2656
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 9817, name: (agetty)
> preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
> 3 locks held by (agetty)/9817:
> #0: ffff888017797098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at:
> tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x27/0x80 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:244
> #1: ffff888017797130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> tty_write_lock+0x23/0x90 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:944
> #2: ffff888046ee93e0 (&gsm->tx_lock){....}-{2:2}, at:
> gsmld_write+0x63/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3410
> irq event stamp: 3146
> hardirqs last enabled at (3145): [<ffffffff8a0f3a32>]
> syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x22/0xb0 kernel/entry/common.c:111
> hardirqs last disabled at (3146): [<ffffffff8a12e6b3>]
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline]
> hardirqs last disabled at (3146): [<ffffffff8a12e6b3>]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x53/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
> softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff814b301d>]
> copy_process+0x1a8d/0x7490 kernel/fork.c:2211
> softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
> Preemption disabled at:
> [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
> CPU: 0 PID: 9817 Comm: (agetty) Not tainted 6.2.0 #1
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> __might_resched.cold+0x222/0x26b kernel/sched/core.c:10045
> console_lock+0x1c/0x80 kernel/printk/printk.c:2656
> do_con_write+0x114/0x1e40 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:2908
> con_write+0x26/0x40 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3295
Hmm, tty_operations::write() is documented as "not allowed to sleep".
But vt's write was always sleeping :D. I wonder:
1) can gsmld be switched to a mutex?
2) what do other ldiscs do? FWIW n_tty does mutex, so allows ::write()
to sleep.
> gsmld_write+0xd0/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3413
> do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1018 [inline]
> file_tty_write.isra.0+0x48f/0x820 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1089
> call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline]
> new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
> vfs_write+0x9cf/0xd90 fs/read_write.c:584
> ksys_write+0x12c/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7f5538c101b0
> Code: 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 8b 05 19 7e 20 00 c3 0f 1f 84
> 00 00 00 00 00 83 3d 19 c2 20 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d
> 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 ae fc ff ff 48 89 04 24
> RSP: 002b:00007ffdb4aadbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000a RCX: 00007f5538c101b0
> RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 00007f553b13ccbe RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00007f553b13ccbe R08: 00007ffdb4aadba0 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 00007ffdb4aadea0
> </TASK>
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-18 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-18 3:44 Yu Hao
2023-04-18 6:09 ` Greg KH
2023-04-18 6:51 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2023-04-20 8:21 ` D. Starke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a994a13-d1f2-87a8-09e4-a877e65ed166@kernel.org \
--to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhao016@ucr.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®