mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Yu Hao <yhao016@ucr.edu>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in __might_resched
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:51:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a994a13-d1f2-87a8-09e4-a877e65ed166@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+UBctCZok5FSQ=LPRA+A-jocW=L8FuMVZ_7MNqhh483P5yN8A@mail.gmail.com>

On 18. 04. 23, 5:44, Yu Hao wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We found the following issue using syzkaller on Linux v6.2.0.
> A similar bug was found in function `n_hdlc_tty_wakeup` before.
> (https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/XAyZCUO-eAY/m/Lpj5SzDNAwAJ)
> Now it is found in a different caller `gsmld_write`.
> It needs to fix the bug in `gsmld_write` again.
> 
> The full report including the C reproducer:
> https://gist.github.com/ZHYfeng/eb410de5d7aec253d8c83cf34e628d6a
> 
> The brief report is below:
> 
> Syzkaller hit 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in
> __might_resched' bug.
> 
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/printk/printk.c:2656
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 9817, name: (agetty)
> preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
> 3 locks held by (agetty)/9817:
>   #0: ffff888017797098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at:
> tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x27/0x80 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:244
>   #1: ffff888017797130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> tty_write_lock+0x23/0x90 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:944
>   #2: ffff888046ee93e0 (&gsm->tx_lock){....}-{2:2}, at:
> gsmld_write+0x63/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3410
> irq event stamp: 3146
> hardirqs last  enabled at (3145): [<ffffffff8a0f3a32>]
> syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x22/0xb0 kernel/entry/common.c:111
> hardirqs last disabled at (3146): [<ffffffff8a12e6b3>]
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline]
> hardirqs last disabled at (3146): [<ffffffff8a12e6b3>]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x53/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
> softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff814b301d>]
> copy_process+0x1a8d/0x7490 kernel/fork.c:2211
> softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
> Preemption disabled at:
> [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
> CPU: 0 PID: 9817 Comm: (agetty) Not tainted 6.2.0 #1
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
>   dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
>   __might_resched.cold+0x222/0x26b kernel/sched/core.c:10045
>   console_lock+0x1c/0x80 kernel/printk/printk.c:2656
>   do_con_write+0x114/0x1e40 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:2908
>   con_write+0x26/0x40 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3295

Hmm, tty_operations::write() is documented as "not allowed to sleep". 
But vt's write was always sleeping :D. I wonder:
1) can gsmld be switched to a mutex?
2) what do other ldiscs do? FWIW n_tty does mutex, so allows ::write() 
to sleep.

>   gsmld_write+0xd0/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:3413
>   do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1018 [inline]
>   file_tty_write.isra.0+0x48f/0x820 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1089
>   call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline]
>   new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
>   vfs_write+0x9cf/0xd90 fs/read_write.c:584
>   ksys_write+0x12c/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637
>   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>   do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7f5538c101b0
> Code: 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 8b 05 19 7e 20 00 c3 0f 1f 84
> 00 00 00 00 00 83 3d 19 c2 20 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d
> 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 ae fc ff ff 48 89 04 24
> RSP: 002b:00007ffdb4aadbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000a RCX: 00007f5538c101b0
> RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 00007f553b13ccbe RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00007f553b13ccbe R08: 00007ffdb4aadba0 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 00007ffdb4aadea0
>   </TASK>

-- 
js
suse labs


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18  3:44 Yu Hao
2023-04-18  6:09 ` Greg KH
2023-04-18  6:51 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2023-04-20  8:21   ` D. Starke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a994a13-d1f2-87a8-09e4-a877e65ed166@kernel.org \
    --to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhao016@ucr.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®