From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/2] bpf: htab: Split htab_elem_lru and htab_elem_pcpu off of htab_elem
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:47:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5aa50086-4dbc-4ebf-bfc4-248a6c6a05de@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928150121.1712559-2-tjmercier@google.com>
On 9/28/26 4:01 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> The htab_elem struct is used as the per-element type for all BPF hash
> map types and includes bpf_lru_node in a union with a ptr_to_pptr
> pointer. For standard (non-LRU, non-PCPU) hash maps, the 24 byte union
> allocated for every element is entirely unused. For non-preallocated
> PCPU maps, ptr_to_pptr only requires 8 bytes, leaving 16 bytes of unused
> overhead in the union. For preallocated PCPU maps ptr_to_pptr is unused
> since elements are freed to the PCPU freelist.
>
> Eliminate this per-element memory overhead by splitting htab_elem into
> dedicated structures for each map type:
> - struct htab_elem: Minimal structure for standard hash maps and
> preallocated PCPU maps (saves 24 bytes per element).
> - struct htab_elem_pcpu: Structure for non-preallocated PCPU maps
> containing ptr_to_pptr (saves 16 bytes per element).
> - struct htab_elem_lru: Retains struct bpf_lru_node for LRU maps.
>
> Place lru_node and ptr_to_pptr before struct htab_elem in
> htab_elem_lru and htab_elem_pcpu respectively, and track the offset of
> htab_elem from the start of the element allocation in htab->elem_offset.
> This keeps key and value at constant compile-time offsets from struct
> htab_elem across all hash map types, avoiding dynamic key offset
> calculations on lookups.
>
> Use sizeof(struct htab_elem_lru) for the element size rollover check in
> htab_map_alloc_check() since it is now the largest element variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 152 ++++++++++++------
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index 53c99fe4f176..5db11a21ce98 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct bpf_htab {
> bool use_percpu_counter;
> u32 n_buckets; /* number of hash buckets */
> u32 elem_size; /* size of each element in bytes */
> + u32 elem_offset;/* offset of htab_elem in bytes */
> u32 hashrnd;
> };
>
> @@ -117,15 +118,25 @@ struct htab_elem {
> };
> };
> };
> - union {
> - /* pointer to per-cpu pointer */
> - void *ptr_to_pptr;
> - struct bpf_lru_node lru_node;
> - };
> - u32 hash;
> + u32 hash __aligned(8);
> char key[] __aligned(8);
> };
>
> +struct htab_elem_lru {
> + struct bpf_lru_node lru_node;
> + struct htab_elem elem;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Only for non-preallocated PCPU maps. Preallocated PCPU maps don't need
> + * ptr_to_pptr, and use htab_elem.
> + */
> +struct htab_elem_pcpu {
> + /* pointer to per-cpu pointer */
> + void *ptr_to_pptr;
> + struct htab_elem elem;
> +};
> +
> struct htab_btf_record {
> struct btf_record *record;
> u32 key_size;
> @@ -183,6 +194,21 @@ static inline bool is_fd_htab(const struct bpf_htab *htab)
> return htab->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS;
> }
>
> +static void *htab_elem_container(const struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
> +{
> + return (void *)l - htab->elem_offset;
> +}
> +
> +static void *htab_elem_get_ptr_to_pptr(struct htab_elem *l)
> +{
> + return container_of(l, struct htab_elem_pcpu, elem)->ptr_to_pptr;
> +}
> +
> +static void htab_elem_set_ptr_to_pptr(struct htab_elem *l, void *ptr)
> +{
> + container_of(l, struct htab_elem_pcpu, elem)->ptr_to_pptr = ptr;
> +}
> +
> static inline void *htab_elem_value(struct htab_elem *l, u32 key_size)
> {
> return l->key + round_up(key_size, 8);
> @@ -206,7 +232,7 @@ static void *fd_htab_map_get_ptr(const struct bpf_map *map, struct htab_elem *l)
>
> static struct htab_elem *get_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, int i)
> {
> - return (struct htab_elem *) (htab->elems + i * (u64)htab->elem_size);
> + return htab->elems + i * (u64)htab->elem_size + htab->elem_offset;
> }
>
> /* Both percpu and fd htab support in-place update, so no need for
> @@ -300,16 +326,16 @@ static void htab_free_elems(struct bpf_htab *htab)
> * bucket_lock followed by lru_lock is not allowed. In such cases,
> * bucket_lock needs to be released first before acquiring lru_lock.
> */
> -static struct htab_elem *prealloc_lru_pop(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
> - u32 hash)
> +static struct htab_elem_lru *prealloc_lru_pop(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
> + u32 hash)
> {
> struct bpf_lru_node *node = bpf_lru_pop_free(&htab->lru, hash);
> - struct htab_elem *l;
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l;
>
> if (node) {
> bpf_map_inc_elem_count(&htab->map);
> - l = container_of(node, struct htab_elem, lru_node);
> - memcpy(l->key, key, htab->map.key_size);
> + l = container_of(node, struct htab_elem_lru, lru_node);
> + memcpy(l->elem.key, key, htab->map.key_size);
> return l;
> }
>
> @@ -349,8 +375,8 @@ static int prealloc_init(struct bpf_htab *htab)
> if (htab_is_lru(htab))
> err = bpf_lru_init(&htab->lru,
> htab->map.map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU,
> - offsetof(struct htab_elem, hash) -
> - offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node),
> + offsetof(struct htab_elem_lru, elem.hash) -
> + offsetof(struct htab_elem_lru, lru_node),
> htab_lru_map_delete_node,
> htab);
> else
> @@ -361,11 +387,12 @@ static int prealloc_init(struct bpf_htab *htab)
>
> if (htab_is_lru(htab))
> bpf_lru_populate(&htab->lru, htab->elems,
> - offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node),
> + offsetof(struct htab_elem_lru, lru_node),
> htab->elem_size, num_entries);
> else
> pcpu_freelist_populate(&htab->freelist,
> - htab->elems + offsetof(struct htab_elem, fnode),
> + htab->elems + htab->elem_offset +
> + offsetof(struct htab_elem, fnode),
> htab->elem_size, num_entries);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -453,7 +480,7 @@ static int htab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if ((u64)attr->key_size + attr->value_size >= KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE -
> - sizeof(struct htab_elem))
> + sizeof(struct htab_elem_lru))
> /* if key_size + value_size is bigger, the user space won't be
> * able to access the elements via bpf syscall. This check
> * also makes sure that the elem_size doesn't overflow and it's
> @@ -586,7 +613,13 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
>
> htab->n_buckets = roundup_pow_of_two(htab->map.max_entries);
>
> - htab->elem_size = sizeof(struct htab_elem) +
> + if (htab_is_lru(htab))
> + htab->elem_offset = offsetof(struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
> + else if (percpu && !prealloc)
> + htab->elem_offset = offsetof(struct htab_elem_pcpu, elem);
> +
> + htab->elem_size = htab->elem_offset +
> + sizeof(struct htab_elem) +
> round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8);
> if (percpu)
> htab->elem_size += sizeof(void *);
> @@ -828,8 +861,12 @@ static __always_inline void *__htab_lru_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
> struct htab_elem *l = __htab_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
>
> if (l) {
> - if (mark)
> - bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l->lru_node);
> + if (mark) {
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l_lru =
> + container_of(l, struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
> +
> + bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_lru->lru_node);
> + }
> return htab_elem_value(l, map->key_size);
> }
>
> @@ -852,19 +889,17 @@ static int htab_lru_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
> struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
> const int ret = BPF_REG_0;
> const int ref_reg = BPF_REG_1;
> + const s16 ref_off = (int)offsetof(struct htab_elem_lru, lru_node) +
> + (int)offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref) -
> + (int)offsetof(struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem,
> (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL));
> *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem);
> *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 4);
> - *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret,
> - offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
> - offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref));
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret, ref_off);
> *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, ref_reg, 0, 1);
> - *insn++ = BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, ret,
> - offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
> - offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref),
> - 1);
> + *insn++ = BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, ret, ref_off, 1);
> *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret,
> offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) +
> round_up(map->key_size, 8));
> @@ -896,15 +931,16 @@ static void check_and_cancel_fields(struct bpf_htab *htab,
> static bool htab_lru_map_delete_node(void *arg, struct bpf_lru_node *node)
> {
> struct bpf_htab *htab = arg;
> - struct htab_elem *l = NULL, *tgt_l;
> + struct htab_elem_lru *tgt_l;
> + struct htab_elem *l = NULL;
> struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
> struct hlist_nulls_node *n;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct bucket *b;
> int ret;
>
> - tgt_l = container_of(node, struct htab_elem, lru_node);
> - b = __select_bucket(htab, tgt_l->hash);
> + tgt_l = container_of(node, struct htab_elem_lru, lru_node);
> + b = __select_bucket(htab, tgt_l->elem.hash);
> head = &b->head;
>
> ret = htab_lock_bucket(b, &flags);
> @@ -912,7 +948,7 @@ static bool htab_lru_map_delete_node(void *arg, struct bpf_lru_node *node)
> return false;
>
> hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(l, n, head, hash_node)
> - if (l == tgt_l) {
> + if (l == &tgt_l->elem) {
> hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l->hash_node);
> bpf_map_dec_elem_count(&htab->map);
> break;
> @@ -920,9 +956,9 @@ static bool htab_lru_map_delete_node(void *arg, struct bpf_lru_node *node)
>
> htab_unlock_bucket(b, flags);
>
> - if (l == tgt_l)
> + if (l == &tgt_l->elem)
> check_and_cancel_fields(htab, l);
> - return l == tgt_l;
> + return l == &tgt_l->elem;
> }
>
> /* Called from syscall */
> @@ -989,8 +1025,8 @@ static void htab_elem_free(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
> check_and_cancel_fields(htab, l);
>
> if (htab->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH)
> - bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->pcpu_ma, l->ptr_to_pptr);
> - bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->ma, l);
> + bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->pcpu_ma, htab_elem_get_ptr_to_pptr(l));
> + bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->ma, htab_elem_container(htab, l));
> }
>
> static void htab_put_fd_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
> @@ -1138,6 +1174,8 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
> bpf_map_inc_elem_count(&htab->map);
> }
> } else {
> + void *container;
> +
> if (is_map_full(htab))
> if (!old_elem)
> /* when map is full and update() is replacing
> @@ -1147,11 +1185,12 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
> */
> return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
> inc_elem_count(htab);
> - l_new = bpf_mem_cache_alloc(&htab->ma);
> - if (!l_new) {
> + container = bpf_mem_cache_alloc(&htab->ma);
> + if (!container) {
> l_new = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> goto dec_count;
> }
> + l_new = container + htab->elem_offset;
> }
>
> memcpy(l_new->key, key, key_size);
> @@ -1163,11 +1202,11 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
> void *ptr = bpf_mem_cache_alloc(&htab->pcpu_ma);
>
> if (!ptr) {
> - bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->ma, l_new);
> + bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->ma, htab_elem_container(htab, l_new));
> l_new = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> goto dec_count;
> }
> - l_new->ptr_to_pptr = ptr;
> + htab_elem_set_ptr_to_pptr(l_new, ptr);
> pptr = *(void __percpu **)ptr;
> }
>
> @@ -1310,16 +1349,19 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
>
> static void htab_lru_push_free(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *elem)
> {
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l = container_of(elem, struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
> +
> check_and_cancel_fields(htab, elem);
> bpf_map_dec_elem_count(&htab->map);
> - bpf_lru_push_free(&htab->lru, &elem->lru_node);
> + bpf_lru_push_free(&htab->lru, &l->lru_node);
> }
>
> static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> u64 map_flags)
> {
> struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
> - struct htab_elem *l_new, *l_old = NULL;
> + struct htab_elem *l_old = NULL;
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l_new;
> struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct bucket *b;
> @@ -1347,7 +1389,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value
> l_new = prealloc_lru_pop(htab, key, hash);
> if (!l_new)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - copy_map_value(&htab->map, htab_elem_value(l_new, map->key_size), value);
> + copy_map_value(&htab->map, htab_elem_value(&l_new->elem, map->key_size), value);
>
> ret = htab_lock_bucket(b, &flags);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1362,7 +1404,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value
> /* add new element to the head of the list, so that
> * concurrent search will find it before old elem
> */
> - hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->hash_node, head);
> + hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->elem.hash_node, head);
> if (l_old) {
> bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_new->lru_node);
> hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l_old->hash_node);
> @@ -1374,7 +1416,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value
>
> err_lock_bucket:
> if (ret)
> - htab_lru_push_free(htab, l_new);
> + htab_lru_push_free(htab, &l_new->elem);
> else if (l_old)
> htab_lru_push_free(htab, l_old);
>
> @@ -1458,7 +1500,8 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> bool onallcpus)
> {
> struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
> - struct htab_elem *l_new = NULL, *l_old;
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l_new = NULL;
> + struct htab_elem *l_old;
> struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct bucket *b;
> @@ -1500,15 +1543,18 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> goto err;
>
> if (l_old) {
> - bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_old->lru_node);
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l_old_lru =
> + container_of(l_old, struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
> +
> + bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_old_lru->lru_node);
>
> /* per-cpu hash map can update value in-place */
> pcpu_copy_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_old, key_size),
> value, onallcpus, map_flags);
> } else {
> - pcpu_init_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_new, key_size),
> + pcpu_init_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(&l_new->elem, key_size),
> value, onallcpus, map_flags);
> - hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->hash_node, head);
> + hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->elem.hash_node, head);
> l_new = NULL;
> }
> ret = 0;
> @@ -2505,7 +2551,10 @@ static void *htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> struct htab_elem *l = __htab_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
>
> if (l) {
> - bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l->lru_node);
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l_lru =
> + container_of(l, struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
> +
> + bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_lru->lru_node);
> return this_cpu_ptr(htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size));
> }
>
> @@ -2521,7 +2570,10 @@ static void *htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *k
>
> l = __htab_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
> if (l) {
> - bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l->lru_node);
> + struct htab_elem_lru *l_lru =
> + container_of(l, struct htab_elem_lru, elem);
> +
> + bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_lru->lru_node);
> return per_cpu_ptr(htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size), cpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> index 373c8d17ea55..f71be4fc8dd7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static inline int check_hash(void)
> VERIFY(check_default_noinline(&hash->map, map));
>
> VERIFY(hash->n_buckets == MAX_ENTRIES);
> - VERIFY(hash->elem_size == 64);
> + VERIFY(hash->elem_size == 40);
>
> VERIFY(hash->count.counter == 0);
> VERIFY(bpf_map_sum_elem_count(map) == 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 15:01 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/2] bpf: htab: Reduce memory use of hash maps T.J. Mercier
2026-09-28 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/2] bpf: htab: Split htab_elem_lru and htab_elem_pcpu off of htab_elem T.J. Mercier
2026-09-28 15:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28 18:31 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-29 16:35 ` T.J. Mercier
2026-09-28 18:47 ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
2026-09-28 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] bpf: htab: Reduce elem_size by 8 bytes for small key sizes T.J. Mercier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5aa50086-4dbc-4ebf-bfc4-248a6c6a05de@gmail.com \
--to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®