From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com>,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
matttbe@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org,
linux@jordanrome.com, ameryhung@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com,
houtao1@huawei.com, emil@etsalapatis.com, yatsenko@meta.com,
isolodrai@meta.com, a.s.protopopov@gmail.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz,
memxor@gmail.com, vmalik@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
tj@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, mrpre@163.com,
jakub@cloudflare.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Prepare to add -Wsign-compare for bpf tests
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:04:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ad26663-a3cc-4bf4-9d6f-8213ac8e8ce6@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925103559.14876-4-mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com>
On 9/25/25 12:35 PM, Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa wrote:
> -Change only variable types for correct sign comparisons
>
> Signed-off-by: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com>
Pls write some better commit messages and not just copy/paste the same $subj/
message every time; proper sentences w/o the weird " -" indent. Also say why
this is needed in the commit message, and add a reference to the commit which
initially added this as a TODO, i.e. 495d2d8133fd ("selftests/bpf: Attempt to
build BPF programs with -Wsign-compare"). If you group these, then maybe also
include the parts of the compiler-emitted warnings during build which are
relevant to the code changes you do here.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c | 4 ++--
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 5 +++--
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
> index 67a77944ef29..12ad0ec91021 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static __always_inline int handle_ipv4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct bpf_dynptr *xd
> struct vip vip = {};
> int dport;
> __u32 csum = 0;
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
>
> __builtin_memset(eth_buffer, 0, sizeof(eth_buffer));
> __builtin_memset(iph_buffer_tcp, 0, sizeof(iph_buffer_tcp));
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c
> index 93267a68825b..e9b7bbff5c23 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static __always_inline int handle_ipv4(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> struct vip vip = {};
> int dport;
> __u32 csum = 0;
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
>
> if (iph + 1 > data_end)
> return XDP_DROP;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c
> index fad94e41cef9..85ef3c0a3e20 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ bool encap_v4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct ctl_value *cval,
>
> next_iph_u16 = (__u16 *) iph;
> __pragma_loop_unroll_full
> - for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> csum += *next_iph_u16++;
> iph->check = ~((csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16));
> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, (int)sizeof(struct iphdr)))
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ int send_icmp_reply(void *data, void *data_end)
> iph->check = 0;
> next_iph_u16 = (__u16 *) iph;
> __pragma_loop_unroll_full
> - for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> csum += *next_iph_u16++;
> iph->check = ~((csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16));
> return swap_mac_and_send(data, data_end);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> index 44190efcdba2..f99957773c3a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ __u64 uretprobe_multi_func_3_result = 0;
>
> __u64 uprobe_multi_sleep_result = 0;
>
> -int pid = 0;
> +__u32 pid = 0;
> int child_pid = 0;
> int child_tid = 0;
> int child_pid_usdt = 0;
> int child_tid_usdt = 0;
>
> -int expect_pid = 0;
> +__u32 expect_pid = 0;
> bool bad_pid_seen = false;
> bool bad_pid_seen_usdt = false;
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
> index 8fbcd69fae22..017f1859ebe8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> #include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
> #include "bpf_misc.h"
>
> @@ -10,8 +11,8 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>
> int pid = 0;
>
> -int idx_entry = 0;
> -int idx_return = 0;
> +size_t idx_entry = 0;
> +size_t idx_return = 0;
>
> __u64 test_uprobe_cookie_entry[6];
> __u64 test_uprobe_cookie_return[3];
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c
> index 75dd922e4e9f..72f9f8c23c93 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ int loop_inside_iter_volatile_limit(const void *ctx)
> {
> struct bpf_iter_num it;
> int *v, sum = 0;
> - __u64 i = 0;
> + __s32 i = 0;
>
> bpf_iter_num_new(&it, 0, ARR2_SZ);
> while ((v = bpf_iter_num_next(&it))) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 10:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] selftests/bpf: Prepare to add -Wsign-compare for bpf selftests Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-09-25 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] selftests/bpf: Prepare to add -Wsign-compare for bpf tests Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-09-25 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] " Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-09-25 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] " Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-09-25 15:04 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2025-09-25 16:26 ` Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-09-25 16:18 ` vivek yadav
2025-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] selftests/bpf: Prepare to add -Wsign-compare for bpf selftests Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-26 8:00 ` Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ad26663-a3cc-4bf4-9d6f-8213ac8e8ce6@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=isolodrai@meta.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@jordanrome.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mrpre@163.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®