mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question on lazy tlb flush
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 10:17:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5af5f7aa8ac48d2c8a2d1809e3c7932824958a76.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd421c2c-8507-6652-2ef7-a6f3b20efcd2@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2198 bytes --]

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 12:54 +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Hi Maintainers,
> 
> A question raised when I learned below code.  Appreciate any help me 
> understand the code.
> 
> void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>                               const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
> 
> {
> 
> ...
> 
>          /*
>           * If no page tables were freed, we can skip sending IPIs to
>           * CPUs in lazy TLB mode. They will flush the CPU themselves
>           * at the next context switch.
>           *
>           * However, if page tables are getting freed, we need to
> send the
>           * IPI everywhere, to prevent CPUs in lazy TLB mode from
> tripping
>           * up on the new contents of what used to be page tables,
> while
>           * doing a speculative memory access.
>           */
>          if (info->freed_tables)
>                  smp_call_function_many(cpumask,
> flush_tlb_func_remote,
>                                 (void *)info, 1);
>          else
>                  on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, 
> flush_tlb_func_remote,
>                                  (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC,
> cpumask);
> 
> }
> 
> I just didn't understand how a kernel thread could trip up on the
> new 
> contents of what used to be page tables. I presume the freed page
> tables 
> are user mapping?

That is correct, and you ask a very good question.

The software does indeed not access userspace memory
addresses from kernel threads.

However, the CPU itself can do speculative loads from
userspace memory addresses, even when the software thread
is running exclusively in kernel mode.

Add to that the fact that the page table pages can get
reused for something else after they have been freed, and
that the CPU can cache intermediate translations (eg. PUD
and PMD level things get cached in the TLB), and you might
end up with a speculative load poking at a PCI register,
or something else that trips up the machine.

For that reason, when page table pages get freed, we need
to flush the TLBs of all users, inluding lazy TLB kernel
threads.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-29 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29  4:54 Zhenzhong Duan
2019-05-29 14:17 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2019-05-30  2:09   ` Zhenzhong Duan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5af5f7aa8ac48d2c8a2d1809e3c7932824958a76.camel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®