From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Zihan Xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, horms@verge.net.au,
pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf v4 1/3] ipvs: wait the running timer cb on conn deletion
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:11:55 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5afea8e9-5250-8ee4-e1ea-4e16289f4447@ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfc9f33299baa890537aacdc3082c85e1a6eccc9.1790146910.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Hello,
On Wed, 23 Sep 2026, Zihan Xi wrote:
> From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
>
> Sashiko reports for problem when deleting connections.
>
> If connection timer expires, its callback can not be
> concurrently running but if connection is deleted
> the callback can be running on another CPU even
> after all references are released. Before now we
> continued with the connection freeing, risking the
> callback to access the deleted connection after it
> is freed. As ip_vs_conn_del*() run under RCU lock
> there is no risk accessing a freed connection by
> concurrent timer callback as Sashiko warns, may
> be only if our timer expires and we try to delete
> the cp->control chain.
>
> Fix that by failing the ip_vs_conn_unlink() call after
> refcnt is restored to 1 allowing the timer callback
> to be scheduled for new execution which should happen
> after the detected running callback finishes.
>
> One of two things can happen when we detect the
> running callback:
>
> 1. the concurrent timer callback can see refcnt 0 and
> do nothing, so we will schedule new timer callback to
> expire the connection after the running one finishes
>
> 2. the concurrent timer callback can see refcnt 1 and
> to expire the connection as usually, in this case we
> will see refcnt 0 and will do nothing
>
> Add explicit rcu_read_lock() while deleting the cp->control
> chain to protect from concurrent timer callback for ct to
> expire it before us.
>
> During such races, try to keep 0 in cp->timeout as it is
> a request for deleting our cp->control chain immediately.
>
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1789435989.git.zihanx%40nebusec.ai
> Fixes: f9200a52eedf ("ipvs: avoid expiring many connections from timer")
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Sashiko reports for refcount problem:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1790146910.git.zihanx%40nebusec.ai
Will send new version...
pw-bot: changes-requested
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> index 6fa3e1dc534c3..32cfc02aa2912 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> @@ -313,17 +313,34 @@ static inline int ip_vs_conn_hash(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> /* Try to unlink ip_vs_conn from conn_tab.
> * returns bool success.
> */
> -static inline bool ip_vs_conn_unlink(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> +static inline bool ip_vs_conn_unlink(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, bool my_cb)
> {
> struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp->ipvs;
> struct hlist_bl_head *head, *head2;
> u32 hash_key, hash_key2;
> struct ip_vs_rht *t;
> - bool ret = false;
> bool use2;
>
> + if (!refcount_dec_if_one(&cp->refcnt))
> + return false;
> +
> if (cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_ONE_PACKET)
> - return refcount_dec_if_one(&cp->refcnt);
> + return true;
> +
> + /* Revalidate after conn is excluded from traffic:
> + * - not controlling other conns
> + * - no pending/running timer callback
> + *
> + * And the winner is ...
> + */
> + if (atomic_read(&cp->n_control) ||
> + (!timer_delete(&cp->timer) && !my_cb)) {
> + /* Not me? Give the timer callback another chance, even
> + * if one is concurrently running during the conn deletion.
> + */
> + refcount_inc(&cp->refcnt);
> + return false;
> + }
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> local_bh_disable();
> @@ -337,15 +354,11 @@ static inline bool ip_vs_conn_unlink(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> false /* new_hash2 */, &head, &head2);
>
> if (cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_HASHED) {
> - /* Decrease refcnt and unlink conn only if we are last user */
> - if (use2 == ip_vs_conn_use_hash2(cp) &&
> - refcount_dec_if_one(&cp->refcnt)) {
> - hlist_bl_del_rcu(&cp->hn0.node);
> - if (use2)
> - hlist_bl_del_rcu(&cp->hn1.node);
> - cp->flags &= ~IP_VS_CONN_F_HASHED;
> - ret = true;
> - }
> + /* Unlink conn as we are the last user */
> + hlist_bl_del_rcu(&cp->hn0.node);
> + if (use2)
> + hlist_bl_del_rcu(&cp->hn1.node);
> + cp->flags &= ~IP_VS_CONN_F_HASHED;
> }
>
> conn_tab_unlock(head, head2);
> @@ -353,7 +366,7 @@ static inline bool ip_vs_conn_unlink(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> local_bh_enable();
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - return ret;
> + return true;
> }
>
>
> @@ -1319,34 +1332,29 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
> kmem_cache_free(ip_vs_conn_cachep, cp);
> }
>
> -/* Try to delete connection while not holding reference */
> +/* Try to delete connection while not holding reference.
> + * It can be called concurrently and always under RCU lock.
> + */
> static void ip_vs_conn_del(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> {
> - if (timer_delete(&cp->timer)) {
> - /* Drop cp->control chain too */
> - if (cp->control)
> - cp->timeout = 0;
> - ip_vs_conn_expire(&cp->timer);
> - }
> -}
> + struct timer_list *t = (void *)((unsigned long)(&cp->timer) | 1UL);
>
> -/* Try to delete connection while holding reference */
> -static void ip_vs_conn_del_put(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> -{
> - if (timer_delete(&cp->timer)) {
> - /* Drop cp->control chain too */
> - if (cp->control)
> - cp->timeout = 0;
> - __ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
> - ip_vs_conn_expire(&cp->timer);
> - } else {
> - __ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
> - }
> + /* Drop cp->control chain too */
> + if (cp->control)
> + cp->timeout = 0;
> + ip_vs_conn_expire(t);
> }
>
> +/* Connection is removed in the following steps:
> + * - timer expires or connection is deleted
> + * - there should be no more references (n_control>0 and refcnt>1)
> + * - there should be no pending timer or a running timer callback (on deletion)
> + */
> static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> - struct ip_vs_conn *cp = timer_container_of(cp, t, timer);
> + bool my_cb = !((unsigned long)t & 1);
> + struct timer_list *t2 = (void *)((unsigned long)t & ~1UL);
> + struct ip_vs_conn *cp = timer_container_of(cp, t2, timer);
> struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp->ipvs;
>
> /*
> @@ -1356,26 +1364,21 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> goto expire_later;
>
> /* Unlink conn if not referenced anymore */
> - if (likely(ip_vs_conn_unlink(cp))) {
> + if (likely(ip_vs_conn_unlink(cp, my_cb))) {
> struct ip_vs_conn *ct = cp->control;
>
> - /* delete the timer if it is activated by other users */
> - timer_delete(&cp->timer);
> -
> /* does anybody control me? */
> if (ct) {
> - bool has_ref = !cp->timeout && __ip_vs_conn_get(ct);
> -
> + rcu_read_lock();
> ip_vs_control_del(cp);
> /* Drop CTL or non-assured TPL if not used anymore */
> - if (has_ref && !atomic_read(&ct->n_control) &&
> + if (!cp->timeout && !atomic_read(&ct->n_control) &&
> (!(ct->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE) ||
> !(ct->state & IP_VS_CTPL_S_ASSURED))) {
> IP_VS_DBG(4, "drop controlling connection\n");
> - ip_vs_conn_del_put(ct);
> - } else if (has_ref) {
> - __ip_vs_conn_put(ct);
> + ip_vs_conn_del(ct);
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> if ((cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_NFCT) &&
> @@ -1410,13 +1413,15 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> refcount_read(&cp->refcnt),
> atomic_read(&cp->n_control));
>
> - refcount_inc(&cp->refcnt);
> - cp->timeout = 60*HZ;
> + if (__ip_vs_conn_get(cp)) {
> + if (cp->timeout || atomic_read(&cp->n_control))
> + cp->timeout = 60 * HZ;
>
> - if (ipvs->sync_state & IP_VS_STATE_MASTER)
> - ip_vs_sync_conn(ipvs, cp, sysctl_sync_threshold(ipvs));
> + if (ipvs->sync_state & IP_VS_STATE_MASTER)
> + ip_vs_sync_conn(ipvs, cp, sysctl_sync_threshold(ipvs));
>
> - __ip_vs_conn_put_timer(cp);
> + __ip_vs_conn_put_timer(cp);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Modify timer, so that it expires as soon as possible.
> --
> 2.43.0
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 9:54 [PATCH nf v4 0/3] ipvs: avoid stack overflow from recursive connection expiration Zihan Xi
2026-09-23 9:54 ` [PATCH nf v4 1/3] ipvs: wait the running timer cb on conn deletion Zihan Xi
2026-09-24 12:11 ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2026-09-23 9:54 ` [PATCH nf v4 2/3] ipvs: avoid stack overflow from recursive connection expiration Zihan Xi
2026-09-23 9:54 ` [PATCH nf v4 3/3] ipvs: reject FTP control ports as data ports Zihan Xi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5afea8e9-5250-8ee4-e1ea-4e16289f4447@ssi.bg \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=zihanx@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®