mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com,
	neelima.krishnan@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/tsx: Use MSR_TSX_CTRL to clear CPUID bits
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:00:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b323e77e251a9c8bcdda498c5cc0095be1e1d3c.1646943780.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1646943780.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>

tsx_clear_cpuid() uses MSR_TSX_FORCE_ABORT to clear CPUID.RTM and
CPUID.HLE. Not all CPUs support MSR_TSX_FORCE_ABORT, alternatively use
MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL when supported.

  [ bp: Document how and why TSX gets disabled. ]

Fixes: 293649307ef9 ("x86/tsx: Clear CPUID bits when TSX always force aborts")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Neelima Krishnan <neelima.krishnan@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/tsx.c   | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 8321c43554a1..8abf995677a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -722,6 +722,7 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	else if (tsx_ctrl_state == TSX_CTRL_DISABLE)
 		tsx_disable();
 	else if (tsx_ctrl_state == TSX_CTRL_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT)
+		/* See comment over that function for more details. */
 		tsx_clear_cpuid();
 
 	split_lock_init();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/tsx.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/tsx.c
index 9c7a5f049292..2835fa89fc6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/tsx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/tsx.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ void tsx_enable(void)
 	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL, tsx);
 }
 
-static bool __init tsx_ctrl_is_supported(void)
+static bool tsx_ctrl_is_supported(void)
 {
 	u64 ia32_cap = x86_read_arch_cap_msr();
 
@@ -84,6 +84,44 @@ static enum tsx_ctrl_states x86_get_tsx_auto_mode(void)
 	return TSX_CTRL_ENABLE;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Disabling TSX is not a trivial business.
+ *
+ * First of all, there's a CPUID bit: X86_FEATURE_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT
+ * which says that TSX is practically disabled (all transactions are
+ * aborted by default). When that bit is set, the kernel unconditionally
+ * disables TSX.
+ *
+ * In order to do that, however, it needs to dance a bit:
+ *
+ * 1. The first method to disable it is through MSR_TSX_FORCE_ABORT and
+ * the MSR is present only when *two* CPUID bits are set:
+ *
+ * - X86_FEATURE_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT
+ * - X86_FEATURE_TSX_FORCE_ABORT
+ *
+ * 2. The second method is for CPUs which do not have the above-mentioned
+ * MSR: those use a different MSR - MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL and disable TSX
+ * through that one. Those CPUs can also have the initially mentioned
+ * CPUID bit X86_FEATURE_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT set and for those the same strategy
+ * applies: TSX gets disabled unconditionally.
+ *
+ * When either of the two methods are present, the kernel disables TSX and
+ * clears the respective RTM and HLE feature flags.
+ *
+ * An additional twist in the whole thing presents late microcode loading
+ * which, when done, may cause for the X86_FEATURE_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT CPUID
+ * bit to be set after the update.
+ *
+ * A subsequent hotplug operation on any logical CPU except the BSP will
+ * cause for the supported CPUID feature bits to get re-detected and, if
+ * RTM and HLE get cleared all of a sudden, but, userspace did consult
+ * them before the update, then funny explosions will happen. Long story
+ * short: the kernel doesn't modify CPUID feature bits after booting.
+ *
+ * That's why, this function's call in init_intel() doesn't clear the
+ * feature flags.
+ */
 void tsx_clear_cpuid(void)
 {
 	u64 msr;
@@ -97,6 +135,10 @@ void tsx_clear_cpuid(void)
 		rdmsrl(MSR_TSX_FORCE_ABORT, msr);
 		msr |= MSR_TFA_TSX_CPUID_CLEAR;
 		wrmsrl(MSR_TSX_FORCE_ABORT, msr);
+	} else if (tsx_ctrl_is_supported()) {
+		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL, msr);
+		msr |= TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR;
+		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL, msr);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -106,13 +148,11 @@ void __init tsx_init(void)
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
-	 * Hardware will always abort a TSX transaction if both CPUID bits
-	 * RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT and TSX_FORCE_ABORT are set. In this case, it is
-	 * better not to enumerate CPUID.RTM and CPUID.HLE bits. Clear them
-	 * here.
+	 * Hardware will always abort a TSX transaction when CPUID
+	 * RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT is set. In this case, it is better not to enumerate
+	 * CPUID.RTM and CPUID.HLE bits. Clear them here.
 	 */
-	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT) &&
-	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSX_FORCE_ABORT)) {
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT)) {
 		tsx_ctrl_state = TSX_CTRL_RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT;
 		tsx_clear_cpuid();
 		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RTM);
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 21:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] TSX update Pawan Gupta
2022-03-10 22:00 ` Pawan Gupta [this message]
2022-03-10 22:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/tsx: Disable TSX development mode at boot Pawan Gupta
2022-03-29 16:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-29 22:47     ` Pawan Gupta
2022-03-30  5:27     ` Pawan Gupta
2022-04-06 19:13       ` Krishnan, Neelima
2022-03-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] TSX update Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b323e77e251a9c8bcdda498c5cc0095be1e1d3c.1646943780.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neelima.krishnan@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®