mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
	Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>, hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>,
	<kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 11/11] sched: Migrate whole chain in proxy_migrate_task()
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 12:16:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b57c6e4-eeeb-4438-8b06-82afe4b4ad65@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124223111.3616950-12-jstultz@google.com>

Hello John,

On 11/25/2025 4:01 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 178ed37850470..775cc06f756d0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1243,6 +1243,9 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	struct mutex			*blocked_on;	/* lock we're blocked on */
>  	struct task_struct		*blocked_donor;	/* task that is boosting this task */
>  	raw_spinlock_t			blocked_lock;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> +	struct list_head		migration_node;

We can just reuse the "p->se.group_node" here instead of adding the
"migration_node" - it is only used to move tasks during load balancing,
and once we deactivate a task, it can no longer be picked for load
balancing so we should be safe (serialized by the rq_lock).

> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER
>  	/*
> diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
> index 34853a511b4d8..78fb7cb83fa5d 100644
> --- a/init/init_task.c
> +++ b/init/init_task.c
> @@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ struct task_struct init_task __aligned(L1_CACHE_BYTES) = {
>  						 &init_task.alloc_lock),
>  #endif
>  	.blocked_donor = NULL,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> +	.migration_node = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.migration_node),
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
>  	.pi_waiters	= RB_ROOT_CACHED,
>  	.pi_top_task	= NULL,
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 0a9a17e25b85d..a7561480e879e 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2137,6 +2137,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>  
>  	p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
>  	p->blocked_donor = NULL; /* nobody is boosting p yet */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->migration_node);
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE
>  	p->sequential_io	= 0;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7f42ec01192dc..0c50d154050a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6723,6 +6723,7 @@ static void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
>  			       struct task_struct *p, int target_cpu)
>  {
>  	struct rq *target_rq = cpu_rq(target_cpu);
> +	LIST_HEAD(migrate_list);
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>  
> @@ -6739,11 +6740,16 @@ static void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
>  	 */
>  	proxy_resched_idle(rq);
>  
> -	WARN_ON(p == rq->curr);
> -
> -	deactivate_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
> -	proxy_set_task_cpu(p, target_cpu);
> -
> +	for (; p; p = p->blocked_donor) {
> +		WARN_ON(p == rq->curr);
> +		deactivate_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
> +		proxy_set_task_cpu(p, target_cpu);
> +		/*
> +		 * We can abuse blocked_node to migrate the thing,
> +		 * because @p was still on the rq.
> +		 */
> +		list_add(&p->migration_node, &migrate_list);
> +	}
>  	/*
>  	 * We have to zap callbacks before unlocking the rq
>  	 * as another CPU may jump in and call sched_balance_rq
> @@ -6755,8 +6761,12 @@ static void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
>  	raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
>  
>  	raw_spin_rq_lock(target_rq);
> -	activate_task(target_rq, p, 0);
> -	wakeup_preempt(target_rq, p, 0);
> +	while (!list_empty(&migrate_list)) {
> +		p = list_first_entry(&migrate_list, struct task_struct, migration_node);
> +		list_del_init(&p->migration_node);
> +		activate_task(target_rq, p, 0);
> +		wakeup_preempt(target_rq, p, 0);
> +	}
>  	raw_spin_rq_unlock(target_rq);

Here, we can extract the core logic of attach_tasks() into a helper and
reuse is as:

  (Included stuff from the suggestion on Patch 6 + the above suggestion;
   build + boot tested with test-ww_mutex and sched-messaging)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5a6ac4d13112..700fd08b2392 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6786,7 +6786,7 @@ static void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
 		 * We can abuse blocked_node to migrate the thing,
 		 * because @p was still on the rq.
 		 */
-		list_add(&p->migration_node, &migrate_list);
+		list_add(&p->se.group_node, &migrate_list);
 	}
 	/*
 	 * Zap balance callbacks and drop the rq_lock
@@ -6794,14 +6794,8 @@ static void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
 	 */
 	guard(proxy_drop_reacquire_rq_lock)(rq, rf);
 
-	raw_spin_rq_lock(target_rq);
-	while (!list_empty(&migrate_list)) {
-		p = list_first_entry(&migrate_list, struct task_struct, migration_node);
-		list_del_init(&p->migration_node);
-		activate_task(target_rq, p, 0);
-		wakeup_preempt(target_rq, p, 0);
-	}
-	raw_spin_rq_unlock(target_rq);
+	/* Move migrate_list to target_rq. */
+	__attach_tasks(target_rq, &migrate_list);
 }
 
 static void proxy_force_return(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7d2e92a55b16..f24ca09ded8a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9700,27 +9700,28 @@ static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
 }
 
-/*
- * attach_tasks() -- attaches all tasks detached by detach_tasks() to their
- * new rq.
- */
-static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
+void __attach_tasks(struct rq *rq, struct list_head *tasks)
 {
-	struct list_head *tasks = &env->tasks;
-	struct task_struct *p;
-	struct rq_flags rf;
-
-	rq_lock(env->dst_rq, &rf);
-	update_rq_clock(env->dst_rq);
+	guard(rq_lock)(rq);
+	update_rq_clock(rq);
 
 	while (!list_empty(tasks)) {
+		struct task_struct *p;
+
 		p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
 		list_del_init(&p->se.group_node);
 
-		attach_task(env->dst_rq, p);
+		attach_task(rq, p);
 	}
+}
 
-	rq_unlock(env->dst_rq, &rf);
+/*
+ * attach_tasks() -- attaches all tasks detached by detach_tasks() to their
+ * new rq.
+ */
+static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
+{
+	__attach_tasks(env->dst_rq, &env->tasks);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 424c40bd46e2..43b9ee90c67f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1368,6 +1368,8 @@ static inline void rq_set_donor(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *t)
 }
 #endif
 
+void __attach_tasks(struct rq *rq, struct list_head *tasks);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
 static inline struct cpumask *sched_group_span(struct sched_group *sg);
 
---

Thoughts?

>  
>  	raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-30  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-24 22:30 [PATCH v24 00/11] Donor Migration for Proxy Execution (v24) John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 01/11] locking: Add task::blocked_lock to serialize blocked_on state John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 02/11] sched: Fix modifying donor->blocked on without proper locking John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 03/11] sched/locking: Add special p->blocked_on==PROXY_WAKING value for proxy return-migration John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 04/11] sched: Add assert_balance_callbacks_empty helper John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 05/11] sched: Add logic to zap balance callbacks if we pick again John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 06/11] sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration) John Stultz
2025-12-30  5:33   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-07  6:48     ` John Stultz
2026-03-10  4:17       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-24 22:30 ` [PATCH v24 07/11] sched: Rework pick_next_task() and prev_balance() to avoid stale prev references John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:31 ` [PATCH v24 08/11] sched: Avoid donor->sched_class->yield_task() null traversal John Stultz
2025-12-30  6:01   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-12-30  9:52     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-01  7:04       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-24 22:31 ` [PATCH v24 09/11] sched: Have try_to_wake_up() handle return-migration for PROXY_WAKING case John Stultz
2026-01-01  9:53   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-11  6:45     ` John Stultz
2026-03-11  9:25       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-24 22:31 ` [PATCH v24 10/11] sched: Add blocked_donor link to task for smarter mutex handoffs John Stultz
2025-11-24 22:31 ` [PATCH v24 11/11] sched: Migrate whole chain in proxy_migrate_task() John Stultz
2025-12-30  6:46   ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-03-07  7:07     ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b57c6e4-eeeb-4438-8b06-82afe4b4ad65@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
    --cc=zezeozue@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®