mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	jhugo@codeaurora.org, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com,
	Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com, ahs3@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] drivers: base: cacheinfo: arm64: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:45:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b8cdaa2-7ab4-078a-8a00-6fc54d94863e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919184751.25110-4-jeremy.linton@arm.com>

Hi,


On 09/19/2017 01:47 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> The /sys cache entries should support ACPI/PPTT generated cache
> topology information. Lets detect ACPI systems and call
> an arch specific cache_setup_acpi() routine to update the hardware
> probed cache topology.
> 
> For arm64, if ACPI is enabled, determine the max number of cache
> levels and populate them using a PPTT table if one is available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/acpi/pptt.c           |  1 +
>   drivers/base/cacheinfo.c      | 17 +++++++++++------
>   include/linux/cacheinfo.h     | 10 ++++++++--
>   4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> index 380f2e2fbed5..2e2cf0d312ba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>    * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>    */
>   
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>   #include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
>   
> @@ -44,9 +45,17 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
>   	this_leaf->type = type;
>   }
>   
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	/*ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support*/
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
> -	unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, of_level;
> +	unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, fw_level;
>   	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
>   
>   	for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) {
> @@ -59,15 +68,19 @@ static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>   		leaves += (ctype == CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE) ? 2 : 1;
>   	}
>   
> -	of_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
> -	if (level < of_level) {
> +	if (acpi_disabled)
> +		fw_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
> +	else
> +		fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
> +
> +	if (level < fw_level) {
>   		/*
>   		 * some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1
>   		 * the information may be available in the device tree
>   		 * only unified external caches are considered here
>   		 */
> -		leaves += (of_level - level);
> -		level = of_level;
> +		leaves += (fw_level - level);
> +		level = fw_level;
>   	}
>   
>   	this_cpu_ci->num_levels = level;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index f7694fa1e0bd..0dd918c3782c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
>   				    struct acpi_pptt_cache *found_cache,
>   				    struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node)
>   {
> +	this_leaf->firmware_node = found_cache;

Naturally, I messed up the v2 changes when I merged them. This line 
should equal the cpu_node.



>   	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_SIZE_PROPERTY_VALID)
>   		this_leaf->size = found_cache->size;
>   	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_LINE_SIZE_VALID)
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> index eb3af2739537..8eca279e50d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
>   static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
>   					   struct cacheinfo *sib_leaf)
>   {
> -	return sib_leaf->of_node == this_leaf->of_node;
> +	return sib_leaf->firmware_node == this_leaf->firmware_node;
>   }
>   
>   /* OF properties to query for a given cache type */
> @@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> +int __weak cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>   static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
>   	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> @@ -225,11 +230,11 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
>   	if (this_cpu_ci->cpu_map_populated)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	if (of_have_populated_dt())
> +	if (!acpi_disabled)
> +		ret = cache_setup_acpi(cpu);
> +	else if (of_have_populated_dt())
>   		ret = cache_setup_of_node(cpu);
> -	else if (!acpi_disabled)
> -		/* No cache property/hierarchy support yet in ACPI */
> -		ret = -ENOTSUPP;
> +
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
> @@ -286,7 +291,7 @@ static void cache_shared_cpu_map_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>   
>   static void cache_override_properties(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
> -	if (of_have_populated_dt())
> +	if (acpi_disabled && of_have_populated_dt())
>   		return cache_of_override_properties(cpu);
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> index 6a524bf6a06d..0114eb9ab67b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ enum cache_type {
>    * @of_node: if devicetree is used, this represents either the cpu node in
>    *	case there's no explicit cache node or the cache node itself in the
>    *	device tree
> + * @firmware_node: Shared with of_node. When not using DT, this may contain
> + *	pointers to other firmware based values. Particularly ACPI/PPTT
> + *	unique values.
>    * @disable_sysfs: indicates whether this node is visible to the user via
>    *	sysfs or not
>    * @priv: pointer to any private data structure specific to particular
> @@ -64,8 +67,10 @@ struct cacheinfo {
>   #define CACHE_ALLOCATE_POLICY_MASK	\
>   	(CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE | CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE)
>   #define CACHE_ID		BIT(4)
> -
> -	struct device_node *of_node;
> +	union {
> +		struct device_node *of_node;
> +		void *firmware_node;
> +	};
>   	bool disable_sysfs;
>   	void *priv;
>   };
> @@ -98,6 +103,7 @@ int func(unsigned int cpu)					\
>   struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu);
>   int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
>   int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu);
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
>   
>   const struct attribute_group *cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf);
>   
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-20 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-19 18:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Support PPTT for ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology Table parsing Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20  7:15   ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-21 18:48     ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-22  1:15       ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: Enable PPTT support on ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drivers: base: cacheinfo: arm64: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20 15:45   ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Topology: Add cluster on die macros and arm64 decoding Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id Jeremy Linton
2017-10-02 21:56   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: topology: Enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU topology Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Support PPTT for ARM64 Xiongfeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b8cdaa2-7ab4-078a-8a00-6fc54d94863e@arm.com \
    --to=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com \
    --cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome