From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751449AbdFFPcS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:32:18 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48230 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751281AbdFFPcQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:32:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] irqchip: sunxi-nmi: Cleanups and fix A31 R_INTC
 register offset
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
References: <20170606055932.22548-1-wens@csie.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Organization: ARM Ltd
Message-ID: <5b984efe-100c-67f9-4ff4-e03ab5366182@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:32:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170606055932.22548-1-wens@csie.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 06/06/17 06:59, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> This is an alternative to Icenowy's recent A64 R_INTC patches.
> 
> This is a two part series. The first four patches clean up the existing
> sunxi-nmi driver. Patches five and six add a new "sun6i-a31-r-intc"
> compatible, which mainly adjusts or removes the awkward register region
> offset the old "sun6i-a31-sc-nmi" compatible needed. The remaining
> patches fix or add device nodes for SoC's having this hardware.
> 
> Using "sun6i-a31-r-intc" introduced in this series, instead of Icenowy's
> "sun50i-a64-r-intc" is preferred. This follows our policy of naming
> hardware blocks and compatibles after their first occurrence.
> 
> The first six patches should go through the irqchip tree, while we
> (sunxi) can take the device tree changes after the driver has been
> merged, to avoid breaking linux-next as a whole.

So should I drop the original two patches and take those six instead?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...