From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Jianyong Wu <wujianyong@hygon.cn>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, yu.c.chen@intel.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jianyong.wu@outlook.com, liuyibin@hygon.cn, zhongyuan@hygon.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cache: Fix group_llc_balance being unreachable above the first NUMA level
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 11:02:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b9e949a64935bc280ae72b3acea80745a5600f3.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104141313.185433-1-wujianyong@hygon.cn>
On Wed, 2026-11-04 at 22:13 +0800, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> sched_balance_find_src_group() only considers group_llc_balance when
> sds.prefer_sibling is set:
>
> if (sds.prefer_sibling && local->group_type == group_has_spare &&
> (busiest->group_type == group_llc_balance ||
> sibling_imbalance(env, &sds, busiest, local) > 1))
> goto force_balance;
>
> sds.prefer_sibling mirrors SD_PREFER_SIBLING of the busiest group's child
> sched domain, and sd_init() clears that flag on every SD_NUMA domain.
> So on any domain whose child is itself a NUMA domain, i.e. on systems
> with more than one NUMA level such as multiple nodes per socket, groups
> tagged with group_llc_balance by llc_balance() can never take the
> force_balance path, and the group_llc_balance test there is dead code.
>
> Such a group falls into the !group_overloaded branch below and in the
> common case ends up in out_balanced, so a task that was placed beyond
> the first NUMA level is never pulled into its preferred LLC.
>
> On a 2-socket Hygon system (8 nodes, 32 LLCs, 4 cores per LLC), with
> "spin 3"/"spin 4" (3/4 busy threads of one process), all threads were
> in one LLC in only 41/140 and 0/142 samples; every failing case had a
> straggler on the other socket. With this patch: 195/196 and 180/196.
>
> Only require sds.prefer_sibling for the sibling_imbalance() case, which
> is what it was originally introduced for.
Hi Jianyong,
Here's a suggested reorg of the patch to make the code logic clearer. Also
incorporate some suggestions from Peter on your previous proposal
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260827122816.756234-15-wujianyong@hygon.cn/ .
So we do not do the llc_balance check for non cache aware scheduling case.
Tim
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index cfc982205b98..8a7442189a3b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12192,6 +12192,16 @@ static bool update_llc_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
*/
return sgs->nr_pref_dst_llc > busiest->nr_pref_dst_llc;
}
+
+/*
+ * The busiest group has tasks that prefer the destination LLC and
+ * cache aware scheduling is enabled.
+ */
+static inline bool busiest_llc_balance(struct sg_lb_stats *busiest)
+{
+ return sched_cache_enabled() &&
+ busiest->group_type == group_llc_balance;
+}
#else
static inline void record_sg_llc_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
struct sched_group *group)
@@ -12210,6 +12220,11 @@ static bool update_llc_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
{
return false;
}
+
+static inline bool busiest_llc_balance(struct sg_lb_stats *busiest)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif
/**
@@ -13303,14 +13318,25 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
goto out_balanced;
}
- /*
- * Try to move all excess tasks to a sibling domain of the busiest
- * group's child domain.
- */
- if (sds.prefer_sibling && local->group_type == group_has_spare &&
- (busiest->group_type == group_llc_balance ||
- sibling_imbalance(env, &sds, busiest, local) > 1))
- goto force_balance;
+ if (local->group_type == group_has_spare) {
+
+ if (busiest_llc_balance(busiest))
+ goto force_balance;
+
+ /*
+ * Try to move all excess tasks to a sibling domain of the
+ * busiest group's child domain.
+ */
+ if (sds.prefer_sibling &&
+ sibling_imbalance(env, &sds, busiest, local) > 1)
+ goto force_balance;
+ }
>
> Fixes: f38cc2f0d8a3 ("sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing")
> Reported-by: Yibin Liu <liuyibin@hygon.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <wujianyong@hygon.cn>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 57360f5cdde4..205a0891b0a0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -13294,9 +13294,10 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
> * Try to move all excess tasks to a sibling domain of the busiest
> * group's child domain.
> */
> - if (sds.prefer_sibling && local->group_type == group_has_spare &&
> + if (local->group_type == group_has_spare &&
> (busiest->group_type == group_llc_balance ||
> - sibling_imbalance(env, &sds, busiest, local) > 1))
> + (sds.prefer_sibling &&
> + sibling_imbalance(env, &sds, busiest, local) > 1)))
> goto force_balance;
>
> if (busiest->group_type != group_overloaded) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 14:13 Jianyong Wu
2026-11-04 19:02 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-11-05 2:48 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-11-05 3:04 ` Chen Yu
2026-11-05 4:50 ` Jianyong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b9e949a64935bc280ae72b3acea80745a5600f3.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyibin@hygon.cn \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wujianyong@hygon.cn \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhongyuan@hygon.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®