mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	dhaval@gianis.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/fair: Limit run to parity to the min slice of enqueued entities
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 12:29:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bbe61ee-d384-47b9-b6f2-c9f607f00156@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708165630.1948751-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Hi Vincent,

On 08/07/25 22:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Run to parity ensures that current will get a chance to run its full
> slice in one go but this can create large latency and/or lag for
> entities with shorter slice that have exhausted their previous slice
> and wait to run their next slice.
> 
> Clamp the run to parity to the shortest slice of all enqueued entities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7e82b357763a..85238f2e026a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -884,16 +884,20 @@ struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  /*
>   * Set the vruntime up to which an entity can run before looking
>   * for another entity to pick.
> - * In case of run to parity, we protect the entity up to its deadline.
> + * In case of run to parity, we use the shortest slice of the enqueued
> + * entities to set the protected period.
>   * When run to parity is disabled, we give a minimum quantum to the running
>   * entity to ensure progress.
>   */

If I set my task’s custom slice to a larger value but another task has a smaller slice,
this change will cap my protected window to the smaller slice. Does that mean my custom
slice is no longer honored?

Thanks,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy

>  static inline void set_protect_slice(struct sched_entity *se)
>  {
> -	u64 quantum = se->slice;
> +	u64 quantum;
>  
> -	if (!sched_feat(RUN_TO_PARITY))
> -		quantum = min(quantum, normalized_sysctl_sched_base_slice);
> +	if (sched_feat(RUN_TO_PARITY))
> +		quantum = cfs_rq_min_slice(cfs_rq_of(se));
> +	else
> +		quantum = normalized_sysctl_sched_base_slice;
> +	quantum = min(quantum, se->slice);
>  
>  	if (quantum != se->slice)
>  		se->vprot = min_vruntime(se->deadline, se->vruntime + calc_delta_fair(quantum, se));


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-10  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08 16:56 [PATCH v3 0/6] sched/fair: Manage lag and run to parity with different slices Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] sched/fair: Use protect_slice() instead of direct comparison Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] sched/fair: Fix NO_RUN_TO_PARITY case Vincent Guittot
2025-07-09  9:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-09  9:32     ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] sched/fair: Remove spurious shorter slice preemption Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/fair: Limit run to parity to the min slice of enqueued entities Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10  6:59   ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy [this message]
2025-07-10 10:40     ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-13 18:17         ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-20 10:57           ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-21  9:11             ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-21 15:22               ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-21  9:06           ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched/fair: Fix entity's lag with run to parity Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2025-07-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] sched/fair: Always trigger resched at the end of a protected period Vincent Guittot
2025-07-10 12:46   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bbe61ee-d384-47b9-b6f2-c9f607f00156@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dhaval@gianis.ca \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®