mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: "matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com" <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add runtime PM support
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:58:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bc42364-21e1-56b6-788c-2848b8faa50f@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709280757230.2488@mgerlach-VirtualBox>

Hi,

On 9/28/2017 8:31 PM, matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Vignesh,
> 
> I tried this patch on an Arria10 SOCFPGA devkit against the 4.1.33-ltsi 
> kernel, and it did not go well.  Commands to the flash chip timedout 
> resulting in the probe function failing.  I ran into other problems, not 
> related to cadence-quadspi, that prevented me from testing against 4.9 and 
> 4.12 kernels, but I suspect similar behavior.
> 

Ok, thanks! I will keep the clk_*() calls for now.

Regards
Vignesh
> Matthew Gerlach
> 
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Vignesh R wrote:
> 
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> On Tuesday 26 September 2017 05:19 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>> Ok thanks! Do you know if pm_runtime_get_sync() can enable clocks for
>>>>>> QSPI on SoCFPGA or if clk_prepare_enable() is needed? Just trying to see
>>>>>> if its possible to get rid of clk_*() calls in favor of pm_*() calls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not of the top of my head, sorry. +CC Matthew, he should know.
>>>>
>>>> I am not an expert at the clock framework nor the power management, but I
>>>> did ask around a bit.  No one I asked was planning to change the clk_*()
>>>> calls to pm_*() call, but the feedback was that it would be a good idea.
>>>
>>> The question is, if we do the replacement, will it break on socfpga ?
>>> A quick test might be useful.
>>>
>>
>> yes, a quick qspi test with clk_prepare_enable() replaced by pm_*() calls
>> like below patch would be helpful:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c
>> index 53c7d8e0327a..7ad3e176cc88 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>> #include <linux/timer.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>
>> #define CQSPI_NAME                     "cadence-qspi"
>> #define CQSPI_MAX_CHIPSELECT           16
>> @@ -1206,11 +1207,8 @@ static int cqspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                return -ENXIO;
>>        }
>>
>> -       ret = clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk);
>> -       if (ret) {
>> -               dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable QSPI clock.\n");
>> -               return ret;
>> -       }
>> +       pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>> +       pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>>
>>        cqspi->master_ref_clk_hz = clk_get_rate(cqspi->clk);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards
>> Vignesh
>>
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-24 10:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] K2G: Add QSPI support Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add TI 66AK2G SoC specific compatible Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: add a delay in write sequence Vignesh R
2017-09-24 11:59   ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-24 12:33     ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 13:13       ` Marek Vasut
2017-10-02 12:46         ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add new binding to enable loop-back circuit Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add support to enable loop-back clock circuit Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add runtime PM support Vignesh R
2017-09-24 12:01   ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-24 13:08     ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 13:12       ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-24 13:27         ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 13:51           ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-25 22:41             ` matthew.gerlach
2017-09-25 23:49               ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-27 10:48                 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-28 15:01                   ` matthew.gerlach
2017-10-02 12:28                     ` Vignesh R [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bc42364-21e1-56b6-788c-2848b8faa50f@ti.com \
    --to=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®