From: "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@amd.com>
To: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>, "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Abhigyan ghosh <zscript.team.zs@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Kernel panic in __migrate_swap_task() on 6.16-rc2 (NULL pointer dereference)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 17:49:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bcb752d-813e-4ab4-8519-fae897472b5b@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4VaGDgta2PrG2WhPQ6KndZd3pAf5Fh9oJEf9k1eZ4492Aw_g@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/2/2025 5:23 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> Hi Aithal,
>
> thank you for the reproducer.
>
> With the patched kernel, after running a reproducer, please do
>
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
>
> If the counter is nonzero like this:
> entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 1/1
>
> please post the `cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace` here.
>
> It would be helpful to check if there are any other race conditions
> besides the task exit.
>
> Thank you!
> Jirka
>
None of the four machines running our workload [with the debug patch]
showed any entries.
Entries in Buffer/Entries Written: 0/0
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 1:17 PM Chen, Yu C <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/2/2025 3:36 PM, Aithal, Srikanth wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/2/2025 10:02 AM, Aithal, Srikanth wrote:
>>>> On 6/27/2025 1:03 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>>>>> On 6/27/2025 3:16 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jirka,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/27/2025 5:46 AM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Chen and all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we have now verified that the following commit causes a kernel panic
>>>>>>> discussed in this thread:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ad6b26b6a0a79 sched/numa: add statistics of numa balance task
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reverting this commit fixes the issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm happy to help debug this further or test a proposed fix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks very much for your report, it seems that there is a
>>>>>> race condition that when the swap task candidate was chosen,
>>>>>> but its mm_struct get released due to task exit, then later
>>>>>> when doing the task swaping, the p->mm is NULL which caused
>>>>>> the problem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CPU0 CPU1
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> task_numa_migrate
>>>>>> task_numa_find_cpu
>>>>>> task_numa_compare
>>>>>> # a normal task p is chosen
>>>>>> env->best_task = p
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # p exit:
>>>>>> exit_signals(p);
>>>>>> p->flags |= PF_EXITING
>>>>>> exit_mm
>>>>>> p->mm = NULL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> migrate_swap_stop
>>>>>> __migrate_swap_task((arg->src_task, arg->dst_cpu)
>>>>>> count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP)# p->mm is NULL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please help check if the following debug patch works,
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached the patch:
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>>> index 8988d38d46a3..82fc966b390c 100644
>>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>>> @@ -3364,7 +3364,12 @@ static void __migrate_swap_task(struct
>>>>> task_struct *p, int cpu)
>>>>> {
>>>>> __schedstat_inc(p->stats.numa_task_swapped);
>>>>> count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>>>>> - count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(!p->mm)) {
>>>>> + trace_printk("!! (%d %s) flags=%lx\n", p->pid, p->comm,
>>>>> + p->flags);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>>>>> + }
>>>>>
>>>>> if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
>>>>> struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq;
>>>>
>>>> I was encountering the same issue as mentioned earlier in this thread,
>>>> which has been recurring in our daily linux-next CI builds within our
>>>> virtualization CI stream where we observed this BUG appearing randomly
>>>> during the runs.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, we were able to reproduce this issue while running the
>>>> autonuma benchmark. As mentioned earlier, the BUG would occur randomly
>>>> across iterations, typically between the 5th and 10th iterations.
>>>>
>>>> We consistently encountered this issue up to the 6.16.0-rc4-
>>>> next-20250630 build [https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/
>>>> next/linux-next.git].
>>>>
>>>> After applying the aforementioned patch ontop of next-20250630 build,
>>>> I tested it in our virtualization CI and with the autonuma benchmark
>>>> reproducer described below, and the issue no longer occurred. The
>>>> patch appears to have resolved the reported problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> git clone https://github.com/pholasek/autonuma-benchmark.git
>>>> cd autonuma-benchmark
>>>> for i in $(seq 1 80); do bash ./start_bench.sh -s -t; done
>>>> Note: The server running the autonuma-benchmark must have at least two
>>>> nodes.
>>>>
>>>> If the provided fix is final, please feel free to include the
>>>> following Tested-by tag:
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Srikanth Aithal <Srikanth.Aithal@amd.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@amd.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I apologize for overlooking that this was a debug patch. With this debug
>>> patch applied on top of 6.16.0-rc4-next-20250630, I am unable to
>>> reproduce the issue. However, when I revert this debug patch, I
>>> encounter the issue again on 6.16.0-rc4-next-20250630.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thank you Aithal, this is a debug + fix patch. And Jirka has confirmed
>> that this helps somehow. I'll post a formal one and Cc you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chenyu
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 20:05 Jirka Hladky
2025-06-18 4:43 ` Aithal, Srikanth
2025-06-18 5:19 ` Abhigyan ghosh
2025-06-18 11:34 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-06-26 21:46 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-06-27 7:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-27 7:33 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-01 7:32 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-01 14:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-01 15:10 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-07-01 21:05 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-07-02 11:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-02 11:43 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-07-02 4:32 ` Aithal, Srikanth
2025-07-02 7:36 ` Aithal, Srikanth
2025-07-02 11:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-02 11:53 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-07-02 12:19 ` Aithal, Srikanth [this message]
2025-07-02 13:24 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-07-03 23:50 ` Jirka Hladky
2025-06-27 10:48 ` Jirka Hladky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bcb752d-813e-4ab4-8519-fae897472b5b@amd.com \
--to=sraithal@amd.com \
--cc=Suneeth.D@amd.com \
--cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zscript.team.zs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®