From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: Latency data - 2.6.14-rc3-rt13
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:49:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0510101649s221ab437scc49d6a49269d6b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0510101633lc45fbf8gd2677e5646dc6f93@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/10/05, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/05, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, already that looks interesting. Do I have something going on with
> > > acpi? This is before running Jack. I'm in Gnome.There are a lot of
> > > these messages, but they've stopped. I suppose the 3997 is the delay?
> > > That would coorespond with the info I sent earlier.
> >
> > I think this is a false reading . Sometimes when a system goes idle it
> > will cause interrupt disable latency that isn't real (due to process
> > halting) . You could try turning ACPI off if you can , and turn off
> > power management ..
> >
> > Daniel
>
> OK. NO immediate difference with most of the power management stuff
> turned off. I'll just let it run a few hours and see if I get an xrun.
> If I do I'll look at the logs again and report back.
>
> Thanks for the help. I feel like I've got a chance of spotting something.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
Well, I'm disappointed again. Some xruns came but no additional data
was put into the dmesage file:
( softirq-timer/0-3 |#0): new 3997 us maximum-latency critical section.
=> started at timestamp 253995015: <acpi_processor_idle+0x20/0x379>
=> ended at timestamp 253999013: <thread_return+0xb5/0x11a>
Call Trace:<ffffffff8014e32c>{check_critical_timing+492}
<ffffffff8014e785>{sub_preempt_count_ti+133}
<ffffffff803ec76c>{thread_return+70}
<ffffffff803ec7db>{thread_return+181}
<ffffffff803ec945>{schedule+261} <ffffffff801371ca>{ksoftirqd+138}
<ffffffff80137140>{ksoftirqd+0} <ffffffff8014740d>{kthread+205}
<ffffffff8010e6e6>{child_rip+8} <ffffffff80147340>{kthread+0}
<ffffffff8010e6de>{child_rip+0}
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00000001 ]
| 1-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
.. [<ffffffff803ec238>] .... __schedule+0xb8/0x5a6
.....[<00000000>] .. ( <= 0x0)
=> dump-end timestamp 253999092
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on sdb1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
lightning ~ #
Basically the trace above was there pretty much right after booting. I
mounted a 1394 drive, which is shown, and then started running apps. I
got 3 xruns:
16:42:59.826 XRUN callback (1).
**** alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 0.273 msecs
16:43:03.764 XRUN callback (2).
**** alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 2.082 msecs
16:43:41.618 XRUN callback (3).
**** alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 2.040 msecs
but no additional data in the logs.
So possibly this is an IRQ off latency? Or am I jumping to
conclusions? The trace above, if I understand it, indicates a delay of
nearly 4mS, and again, since I'm trying to run at sub 3mS, that would
seem like a potential problem.
I'm going to completely shut off power management as a test just to
see where that leads.
- Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-10 20:16 Mark Knecht
2005-10-10 20:49 ` Daniel Walker
2005-10-10 21:12 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-10 21:28 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-10 21:44 ` Daniel Walker
2005-10-10 22:09 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-10 22:28 ` Daniel Walker
2005-10-10 23:33 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-10 23:49 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2005-10-11 3:45 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-11 6:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-11 8:56 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-10-11 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-11 22:45 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 0:02 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-12 1:09 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 1:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-12 1:25 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 6:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-12 16:18 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-12 17:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-11 3:56 ` Matan Peled
2005-10-11 4:45 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-11 6:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-11 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-10 21:39 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b0510101649s221ab437scc49d6a49269d6b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®