From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rt24 Won't Apply
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:52:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0605261652h58c3586ft9acaadf0c4f45942@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1148682769.6830.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 5/26/06, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:11 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> >
> > Ingo & (I think) Steven,
> > -rt25 applies cleanly and boots fine on my AMD64 UMP machine.
>
> That's good to hear. BTW, do you mean UP machine? or do you have a
> Uni-Multi-Processor machine :)
Darn - I did it again! Yes, UP, UP, UP. :-)
>
> >
> > mark@lightning ~ $ uname -a
> > Linux lightning 2.6.16-rt25 #1 PREEMPT Fri May 26 14:53:47 PDT 2006
> > x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ GNU/Linux
> > mark@lightning ~ $
> >
> > Thanks to all for putting this fix together. I'm sorry I didn't do
> > much with the 2.6.16-rt series. I was so happy with 2.6.15-rt18 I
> > never moved forward. I promise to take a lot at 2.6.17 when that comes
> > along.
>
> Also, thanks a lot for the comment about 2.6.15-rt18. If it ain't
> broken, don't fix it. There's no reason for you to upgrade if what you
> have works. If you just like to test our stuff, then that's great and
> we really do appreciate it.
True, but I think this problem has been in there since 2.6.16-rt1 so
we could have caught it earlier. That would have been good also.
Anyway, we all do our parts. Being a guitar player mine is small but fun! ;-)
>
> I've been working on embedded devices too much and haven't tested my
> x86_64 machine in a while either, I think the last I booted was in the
> 2.6.15-rt16 (that's the oldest in my /boot directory). Heck, I was
> still running 2.6.15 plain.
>
> I happened to wipe out the flash drive on my embedded device and had to
> wait for the recovery CD iso to be sent to me (Germany happens to have
> some sort of Holiday, so no one was in the office). So I remembered
> that people where having problems with x86_64 and -rt, so I spent the
> day finding out why. It wasn't much of a patch, but boy was it hard to
> find.
And we appreciate both your efforts finding it and Ingo's fast
response to get it rolled into an rt patch so quickly.
Cheers,
Mark
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-26 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-26 19:04 K.R. Foley
2006-05-26 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-26 20:04 ` K.R. Foley
2006-05-26 22:11 ` Mark Knecht
2006-05-26 22:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-26 23:52 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b0605261652h58c3586ft9acaadf0c4f45942@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®