From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762494AbXFJRiR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:38:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753185AbXFJRiI (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:38:08 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:6966 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756837AbXFJRiG (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:38:06 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NvtE8K0vA0IcrLUdsZ/+5UAfdVjQ/H3NiXzWorb/r3Z7o3j87fUUME8/UVt6r4jBitLqlP80Y2mBEXdy+XUtNm6wKbdQG7H/8iacjqOkH3fIjGK/o/nrr1MmQkDdru6Ol636ASe8LI+bXWl0RLlzn4ZLTaU16Dxwvto4ryli/Bg= Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0706101038q2f0e3418t1a595e749b5bfe71@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:38:05 -0700 From: "Mark Knecht" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rt9 - IRQ23 consuming a steady 2.7% of CPU Cc: linux-kernel , "Lee Revell" In-Reply-To: <20070610172452.GA7560@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bdc1c8b0706100946k3acd6374uac8248e78f97433d@mail.gmail.com> <20070610172452.GA7560@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/10/07, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mark Knecht wrote: > > > 23: 1739277 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb2, eth0 > > > 00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) > > ok, that's forcedeth. Does that behavior go away if you revert the > change below, via patch -p0 -R ? > > but in general, -rt will track IRQ cpu usage accurately, while mainline > does not measure it at all when in idle. So a frequent IRQ on mainline > might be using up similar amounts of of CPU time as well, but it's not > reported. > > Ingo > Ingo, GMail is being kranky. Can you please send the patch as a zipped attachment? Thanks, Mark