From: Nate Diller <nate.diller@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1488! (2.6.13.2)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:37:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c49b0ed0510271437x6108130bo4c8d86bc907dc70d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43613EC4.4080006@candelatech.com>
On 10/27/05, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> I was compiling with ext3 as a module, then changed to compiling static
> and un-tarred the new kernel over the old (the old ext3 module was still
> in existence.) I re-ran the mkinitrd and rebooted.
>
> It seems that something still tries to load the ext3 module, and I get the
> BUG seen below. If I remove the ext3 module and re-build the initrd,
> the error goes away.
>
> I was thinking that at the least, the ext3 module code should somehow
> detect
> that it is already built-in and exit it's load attempt very early (before
> triggering whatever bug it hit).
>
There was a thread about this some months ago
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111639356609390&w=2),
and two patches were proposed, to either return NULL here or WARN_ON,
and keep going. Neither seems to have been picked up. Maybe people
think this is not a big problem? I would certainly like to see a way
to prevent modules from being loaded multiple times, or when they are
also compiled-in, but aside from returning NULL here in
kmem_cache_create, I don't see a trivial way of doing it.
NATE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-27 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-27 20:55 Ben Greear
2005-10-27 21:37 ` Nate Diller [this message]
2005-10-28 3:32 Davi Arnaut
2005-10-28 4:53 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-28 10:36 ` Davi Arnaut
2005-10-28 10:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-29 11:37 ` Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c49b0ed0510271437x6108130bo4c8d86bc907dc70d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nate.diller@gmail.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®