From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751397AbeACIBk (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 3 Jan 2018 03:01:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:38678 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751191AbeACIBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2018 03:01:37 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovfeDnERLtYCjzY9aBWkx4RQYqFU7Re+xCCigZlu9wFpz1smmsyytkEHJ+xDVYVxBtGhlOBXQ== Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add entry for the Teclast X98 Plus II To: Darren Hart , Paul Cercueil Cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180102134239.3579-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20180102183928.15267-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20180102234033.GB24794@fury> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: <5c5301e1-48f5-5762-b1d8-95e5f4a2bd8d@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:01:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180102234033.GB24794@fury> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi, On 03-01-18 00:40, Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:39:27PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> Add touchscreen platform data for the Teclast X98 Plus II tablet. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil >> Acked-by: Hans de Goede >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/silead_dmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) >> >> v2: Rebased on top of http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/shortlog/refs/heads/review-andy > > Generally "testing" is the branch you want to base on if linus/master > doesn't work as the review-* branches *will* rebase frequently. > Exceptions exist of course, and this patch is just fine - just for > future reference. This is my "fault", I asked Paul to rebase on top of review-andy as that had 1 new silead_dmi patches missing from testing, so otherwise we would end up with a conflict when merging review branches. Same reason why I've been basing my silead_dmi patches on top of review-andy even though that is an unusual base to use. Regards, Hans