From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:04:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c7920fc-7e15-dbd2-91e6-c6822500d9ec@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83cab22d-71c3-2bbc-856f-6527479f10ec@linux.ibm.com>
On 9/13/23 14:13, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 9/13/23 9:06 AM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
>>
>> 1. Returning a status response code 06 (Invalid address of AP-queue
>> notification byte) when the call to register a guest ISC fails makes no
>> sense.
>>
>> 2. The pages containing the interrupt notification-indicator byte are not
>> freed after a failure to register the guest ISC fails.
>>
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> 3. Since you're already making changes related to gisc registration, you might consider a 3rd patch that looks at the return code for kvm_s390_gisc_unregister and tags the unexpected error rc somehow. This came up in a recent conversation I had with Michael, see this conversation towards the bottom:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/0ddf808c-e929-c975-1b39-5ebc1f2fab62@linux.ibm.com/
When we receive a non-zero return code from kvm_s390_gisc_register, we
log a DBF warning message. We can do the same for a non-zero rc from
kvm_s390_gisc_unregister.
>
> 4. While looking at patch 1 I also had a question re: the AP_RESPONSE_OTHERWISE_CHANGED path in vfio_ap_irq_enable. Here's a snippet of the current code:
>
> case AP_RESPONSE_OTHERWISE_CHANGED:
> /* We could not modify IRQ settings: clear new configuration */
> vfio_unpin_pages(&q->matrix_mdev->vdev, nib, 1);
> kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(kvm, isc);
> break;
>
> Is it safe to unpin the page before unregistering the gisc in this case? Or shouldn't the unpin happen after we have unregistered the gisc / set the IAM?
I don't know the answer to the question, but it makes logical sense; so,
I'll go ahead and create a third patch as you suggested.
>
>> Anthony Krowiak (2):
>> s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure
>> s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration
>> failure
>>
>> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 13:06 Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 18:10 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-09-15 13:16 ` Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 " Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function Matthew Rosato
2023-09-15 14:04 ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c7920fc-7e15-dbd2-91e6-c6822500d9ec@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®