mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:04:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c7920fc-7e15-dbd2-91e6-c6822500d9ec@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83cab22d-71c3-2bbc-856f-6527479f10ec@linux.ibm.com>



On 9/13/23 14:13, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 9/13/23 9:06 AM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
>>
>> 1. Returning a status response code 06 (Invalid address of AP-queue
>>     notification byte) when the call to register a guest ISC fails makes no
>>     sense.
>>     
>> 2. The pages containing the interrupt notification-indicator byte are not
>>     freed after a failure to register the guest ISC fails.
>>
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> 3. Since you're already making changes related to gisc registration, you might consider a 3rd patch that looks at the return code for kvm_s390_gisc_unregister and tags the unexpected error rc somehow.  This came up in a recent conversation I had with Michael, see this conversation towards the bottom:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/0ddf808c-e929-c975-1b39-5ebc1f2fab62@linux.ibm.com/

When we receive a non-zero return code from kvm_s390_gisc_register, we 
log a DBF warning message. We can do the same for a non-zero rc from 
kvm_s390_gisc_unregister.

> 
> 4. While looking at patch 1 I also had a question re: the AP_RESPONSE_OTHERWISE_CHANGED path in vfio_ap_irq_enable.  Here's a snippet of the current code:
> 
> 	case AP_RESPONSE_OTHERWISE_CHANGED:
> 		/* We could not modify IRQ settings: clear new configuration */
> 		vfio_unpin_pages(&q->matrix_mdev->vdev, nib, 1);
> 		kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(kvm, isc);
> 		break;
> 
> Is it safe to unpin the page before unregistering the gisc in this case?  Or shouldn't the unpin happen after we have unregistered the gisc / set the IAM?

I don't know the answer to the question, but it makes logical sense; so, 
I'll go ahead and create a third patch as you suggested.

> 
>> Anthony Krowiak (2):
>>    s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure
>>    s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration
>>      failure
>>
>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13 13:06 Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 18:10   ` Matthew Rosato
2023-09-15 13:16     ` Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 " Tony Krowiak
2023-09-13 18:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function Matthew Rosato
2023-09-15 14:04   ` Tony Krowiak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c7920fc-7e15-dbd2-91e6-c6822500d9ec@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®