From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] swiotlb: Reinstate page-alignment for mappings >= PAGE_SIZE
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:08:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c7c7407-5356-4e12-a648-ae695fe0d1cb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308152829.25754-7-will@kernel.org>
On 2024-03-08 3:28 pm, Will Deacon wrote:
> For swiotlb allocations >= PAGE_SIZE, the slab search historically
> adjusted the stride to avoid checking unaligned slots. This had the
> side-effect of aligning large mapping requests to PAGE_SIZE, but that
> was broken by 0eee5ae10256 ("swiotlb: fix slot alignment checks").
>
> Since this alignment could be relied upon drivers, reinstate PAGE_SIZE
> alignment for swiotlb mappings >= PAGE_SIZE.
This seems clear enough to keep me happy now, thanks! And apologies that
I managed to confuse even myself in the previous thread...
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index c381a7ed718f..c5851034523f 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -992,6 +992,17 @@ static int swiotlb_search_pool_area(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool
> BUG_ON(!nslots);
> BUG_ON(area_index >= pool->nareas);
>
> + /*
> + * Historically, swiotlb allocations >= PAGE_SIZE were guaranteed to be
> + * page-aligned in the absence of any other alignment requirements.
> + * 'alloc_align_mask' was later introduced to specify the alignment
> + * explicitly, however this is passed as zero for streaming mappings
> + * and so we preserve the old behaviour there in case any drivers are
> + * relying on it.
> + */
> + if (!alloc_align_mask && !iotlb_align_mask && alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
> + alloc_align_mask = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> +
> /*
> * Ensure that the allocation is at least slot-aligned and update
> * 'iotlb_align_mask' to ignore bits that will be preserved when
> @@ -1006,13 +1017,6 @@ static int swiotlb_search_pool_area(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool
> */
> stride = get_max_slots(max(alloc_align_mask, iotlb_align_mask));
>
> - /*
> - * For allocations of PAGE_SIZE or larger only look for page aligned
> - * allocations.
> - */
> - if (alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
> - stride = umax(stride, PAGE_SHIFT - IO_TLB_SHIFT + 1);
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&area->lock, flags);
> if (unlikely(nslots > pool->area_nslabs - area->used))
> goto not_found;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 15:28 [PATCH v6 0/6] Fix double allocation in swiotlb_alloc() Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] swiotlb: Fix double-allocation of slots due to broken alignment handling Will Deacon
2024-03-18 3:39 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-18 12:36 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] swiotlb: Enforce page alignment in swiotlb_alloc() Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] swiotlb: Honour dma_alloc_coherent() " Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present Will Deacon
2024-03-11 20:05 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-11 21:36 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-11 22:49 ` Will Deacon
2024-03-12 8:52 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-12 9:38 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 9:51 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-12 12:57 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 0:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-03-12 10:44 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/dma: Force swiotlb_max_mapping_size on an untrusted device Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] swiotlb: Reinstate page-alignment for mappings >= PAGE_SIZE Will Deacon
2024-03-08 16:08 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2024-03-08 16:38 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-08 17:22 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 17:17 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-08 18:08 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 17:28 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 19:02 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-08 19:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] Fix double allocation in swiotlb_alloc() Michael Kelley
2024-03-11 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-11 23:19 ` Will Deacon
2024-03-11 22:55 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c7c7407-5356-4e12-a648-ae695fe0d1cb@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®