From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752599AbdK0PCr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:02:47 -0500
Received: from mail1.skidata.com ([91.230.2.99]:45655 "EHLO mail1.skidata.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752140AbdK0PCq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:02:46 -0500
X-Greylist: delayed 695 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:02:45 EST
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,465,1505772000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="7313398"
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: phy: harmonize phy_id{,_mask} data type
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
CC: <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20171127071645.27077-1-dev@g0hl1n.net>
 <20171127135032.GF19413@lunn.ch>
From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
Message-ID: <5c8e340d-4115-f745-db3a-ebd3bc16ff1d@skidata.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:50:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171127135032.GF19413@lunn.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.16.60.30]
X-ClientProxiedBy: sdex1srv.skidata.net (172.16.10.92) To sdex1srv.skidata.net
 (172.16.10.92)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 11/27/2017 02:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:16:45AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
>> From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
>>
>> Previously phy_id was u32 and phy_id_mask was unsigned int. As the
>> phy_id_mask defines the important bits of the phy_id (and is therefore
>> the same size) these two variables should be the same data type.
> 
> Hi Richard
> 
> It is normal to put inside the [] of the subject line which of the two
> trees this patch is for. In this case net-next.
> 
> No need to resend, but please try to do this for your the next
> networking patch.

Ok. Thank you for the information. Just saw that it's described in
netdev-FAQ.txt. Sorry for not reading that in advance!

> 
> 	   Andrew
>