From: dd <zhongling0719@126.com>
To: "Hyunchul Lee" <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
Cc: "Hongling Zeng" <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>,
linkinjeon@kernel.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Baolin Liu" <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH v12 6/6] ntfs: check the dirty-state commit on remount and unmount
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:58:52 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cc0dc45.49c8.1a0a3dc81ec.Coremail.zhongling0719@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANFS6baYPAN8WS+5Fh8gSr-0iFraaKE2KTft6oFZPP+m3A_RZw@mail.gmail.com>
At 2026-09-15 13:38:41, "Hyunchul Lee" <hyc.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Hongling,
>
>2026년 9월 14일 (월) 오후 5:37, Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>님이 작성:
>>
>> The remount-to-read-only path commits the updated volume flags with
>> ntfs_commit_inode(), a void wrapper around __ntfs_write_inode(), and
>> ignores the blkdev_issue_flush() return value, so a failed commit or
>> flush is reported as success. Once the remount has succeeded no
>> persistence point is ever reached again: ntfs_put_super() skips
>> read-only superblocks and the VFS never syncs one, so fail the
>> remount unless the commit and the flush succeed. The superblock
>> then stays read-write and ntfs_put_super() retries the persistence
>> at unmount. The errors=remount-ro downgrade does not go through
>> ntfs_reconfigure() and is unchanged.
>>
>> A zero-return commit is not trusted blindly: write_mft_record()
>> redirties the record on allocation failure and reports success, so
>> the $Volume inode is required to be clean afterwards.
>>
>> ntfs_put_super() discards the same commit error. Call
>> __ntfs_write_inode() there with the same dirty re-check and warn on
>> failure, as put_super() cannot return an error. The commit is
>> skipped when the dirty-state sync itself failed, as that could write
>> back an inconsistent flag state; a record left dirty by an earlier
>> update is still committed at evict time.
>>
>> NVolErrors() is deliberately not used to detect the failure: it is
>> sticky for the lifetime of the mount, so it cannot distinguish a
>> fresh commit failure from errors recorded before the remount.
>>
>> Hibernated volumes: ntfs_sync_volume_dirty_state() is a no-op for
>> them and never dirties the $Volume inode on such a mount, since the
>> on-disk flags are already dirty and ntfs_set_volume_flags() has
>> nothing to change. The commit only runs if something dirtied the
>> inode independently, as before this patch; mounting hibernated
>> volumes read-only removes even that.
>>
>> Reported-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>> fs/ntfs/super.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/super.c b/fs/ntfs/super.c
>> index 463050ae1b0e..0228d7429596 100644
>> --- a/fs/ntfs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ntfs/super.c
>> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int ntfs_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
>> {
>> struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
>> struct ntfs_volume *vol = NTFS_SB(sb);
>> + int err;
>>
>> ntfs_debug("Entering with remount");
>>
>
>
>The initial sync_filesystem() call in this function still ignores
>the return value.
>
>And the emergency remount(SB_FORCE) does not drain writers
>that are already in progress. This function can commit the
>clean flag while a writer is still modifying metadata.
>
>It seems fine not to clear the flag for SB_FORCE.
>
Hi Hyunchul,
Thanks for the review. Both points are valid and are addressed by the
appended 7/7 patch.
The sync_filesystem() error is now returned and fails the remount, so
the unmount can retry. It is only checked in the read-only direction,
as ext4 does.
For SB_FORCE the dirty bit is never cleared. The sync runs only when
errors are recorded, where it can only set the bit; the commit and
the flush stay, since a writer marking the volume concurrently can
only make the on-disk bit more set, not less. Note that a forced
remount ignores the returned error and turns the superblock read-only
anyway, so the return value matters for the regular remount only.
Thanks,
Hongling
>> @@ -324,14 +325,39 @@ static int ntfs_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
>> * and ntfs_put_super() skips them, so the only remaining
>> * write would be the evict-time commit at unmount, which
>> * a crash never reaches. An error recorded only after
>> - * the remount is still never persisted.
>> + * the remount is still never persisted; a failed commit
>> + * or flush fails the remount, leaving the superblock
>> + * read-write so ntfs_put_super() retries at unmount.
>> */
>> - if (ntfs_sync_volume_dirty_state(vol)) {
>> + err = ntfs_sync_volume_dirty_state(vol);
>> + if (err) {
>> ntfs_warning(sb,
>> "Failed to update dirty bit in volume information flags. Run chkdsk.");
>> - } else if (NInoDirty(NTFS_I(vol->vol_ino))) {
>> - ntfs_commit_inode(vol->vol_ino);
>> - blkdev_issue_flush(sb->s_bdev);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + if (NInoDirty(NTFS_I(vol->vol_ino))) {
>> + /* ntfs_commit_inode() would discard the error. */
>> + err = __ntfs_write_inode(vol->vol_ino, 1);
>> + if (err) {
>> + ntfs_warning(sb,
>> + "Failed to commit volume information flags. Run chkdsk.");
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + /*
>> + * write_mft_record() redirties the record on
>> + * -ENOMEM and still reports success.
>> + */
>> + if (NInoDirty(NTFS_I(vol->vol_ino))) {
>> + ntfs_warning(sb,
>> + "Volume information flags remain dirty after commit. Run chkdsk.");
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>> + err = blkdev_issue_flush(sb->s_bdev);
>> + if (err) {
>> + ntfs_warning(sb,
>> + "Failed to flush volume information flags. Run chkdsk.");
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1876,26 +1902,32 @@ static void ntfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
>> if (ntfs_sync_volume_dirty_state(vol)) {
>> ntfs_warning(sb,
>> "Failed to sync dirty bit in volume information flags. Run chkdsk.");
>> - } else if (NVolErrors(vol)) {
>> + } else {
>> /*
>> - * The dirty bit is on disk now; only warn when the
>> - * sync actually succeeded, or this message would
>> - * contradict the one above.
>> + * __ntfs_write_inode(), not the void
>> + * ntfs_commit_inode() wrapper: the error can only
>> + * be warned about here. The mirror inode is only
>> + * released below: writing the $Volume record (mft
>> + * record number 3, below vol->mftmirr_size) mirrors
>> + * it through ntfs_sync_mft_mirror(), which fails
>> + * with -EIO once vol->mftmirr_ino is gone.
>> */
>> - ntfs_warning(sb,
>> - "Volume has errors. Leaving volume marked dirty. Run chkdsk.");
>> + if (__ntfs_write_inode(vol->vol_ino, 1)) {
>> + ntfs_warning(sb,
>> + "Failed to commit volume information flags. Run chkdsk.");
>> + } else if (NInoDirty(NTFS_I(vol->vol_ino))) {
>> + ntfs_warning(sb,
>> + "Volume information flags remain dirty after commit. Run chkdsk.");
>> + } else if (NVolErrors(vol)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Only warn once the commit has succeeded,
>> + * or this could contradict a failure
>> + * reported above.
>> + */
>> + ntfs_warning(sb,
>> + "Volume has errors. Leaving volume marked dirty. Run chkdsk.");
>> + }
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * Commits the updated volume flags if they were written.
>> - * The mft mirror must still be around for this: the
>> - * $Volume record (mft record number 3, below
>> - * vol->mftmirr_size) is mirrored by write_mft_record()
>> - * through ntfs_sync_mft_mirror(), which fails with -EIO
>> - * and leaves the mirror stale once vol->mftmirr_ino is
>> - * gone, so the mirror inode is only released after this
>> - * commit.
>> - */
>> - ntfs_commit_inode(vol->vol_ino);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
>
>--
>Thanks,
>Hyunchul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 8:37 [PATCH v12 0/6] ntfs: fix volume flag races and persist the recorded error state Hongling Zeng
2026-09-14 8:37 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] ntfs: fix volume flag update races Hongling Zeng
2026-09-14 8:37 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] ntfs: set the volume dirty bit unconditionally on metadata changes Hongling Zeng
2026-09-14 8:37 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] ntfs: sync the volume dirty bit with the recorded error state Hongling Zeng
2026-09-14 8:37 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] ntfs: persist the dirty state after the final put_super() commits Hongling Zeng
2026-09-14 8:37 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] ntfs: do not clear the volume dirty bit during sync Hongling Zeng
2026-09-14 8:37 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] ntfs: check the dirty-state commit on remount and unmount Hongling Zeng
2026-09-15 5:38 ` Hyunchul Lee
2026-09-15 6:58 ` dd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cc0dc45.49c8.1a0a3dc81ec.Coremail.zhongling0719@126.com \
--to=zhongling0719@126.com \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liubaolin@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®