From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li@intel.com>
To: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>, Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "Li,
Philip" <philip.li@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kselftests] compaction_test is blocked
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:58:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cdc12c4-a85f-f1bd-8008-52296f90da3a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30e882ea-1e79-44bf-9a85-c0be105ec218@intel.com>
On 2018年02月12日 11:26, Li Zhijian wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月11日 13:44, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2018 05:11 AM, Dan Rue wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> kselftests is integrated Intel 0Day project.
>>>> Sometimes we found compaction_test is blocked for more than 1 hours
>>>> until i kill it.
>>>>
>>>> Try to figure out where it is running, i added some log to this case.
>>>>
>>>> the test log is like:
>>>> -------------------
>>>> [ 111.750543] main: 248
>>>> [ 111.750544]-
>>>> [ 111.750821] check_compaction: 98
>>>> [ 111.750822]-
>>>> [ 111.751102] check_compaction: 105
>>>> [ 111.751103]-
>>>> [ 111.751362] check_compaction: 111
>>>> [ 111.751363]-
>>>> [ 111.751621] check_compaction: 118
>>>> [ 111.751622]-
>>>> [ 111.751879] check_compaction: 123
>>>> [ 111.751880]-
>>>> -------------------
>>>> 118 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
>>>> 119 lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
>>>> 120
>>>> 121 /* Request a large number of huge pages. The Kernel
>>>> will allocate
>>>> 122 as much as it can */
>>>> 123 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", __func__,
>>>> __LINE__); <<<======== the last line we can catch.
>>>> 124 if (write(fd, "100000", (6*sizeof(char))) !=
>>>> (6*sizeof(char))) { <<<<============ blocking position
>>>> 125 perror("Failed to write 100000 to
>>>> /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages\n");
>>>> 126 goto close_fd;
>>>> 127 }
>>>> 128
>>>> 129 lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
>>>> 130
>>>> 131 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
>>>> 132 if (read(fd, nr_hugepages, sizeof(nr_hugepages)) <= 0) {
>>>> 133 perror("Failed to re-read from
>>>> /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages\n");
>>>> 134 goto close_fd;
>>>> 135 }
>>>> -------------------
>>>>
>>>> According to above log and code, it most likely it is blocking at
>>>> the writing operation.
>>>>
>>>> my environment is like:
>>>> OS: debian
>>>> kernel: v4.15
>>>> model: Ivytown Ivy Bridge-EP
>>>> nr_cpu: 48
>>>> memory: 64G
>>> Hi Zhijian,
>>>
>>> Please try this patch in mainline:
>>>
>>> 4c1baad22390 kselftest: fix OOM in memory compaction test
>>
>> Hi Dan
>>
>> Thanks for your replies.
>>
>> I run this case on v4.15, looks this patch is already merged to v4.15.
>> lizhijian@inn:~/linux$ git describe 4c1baad
>> v4.15-rc2-2-g4c1baad223906
>
> My mistake, this path is not contained by v4.15 yet.
> i will have a try.
Hi Dan,
I ran this case on this commit 4c1baad22390, this issue still occurs.
root@ivb44 ~# dmesg | tail -n 30
[ 105.825870] main: 247
[ 105.825994] main: 242
[ 105.826130] main: 247
[ 105.826250] main: 242
[ 105.826394] main: 247
[ 105.826506] main: 242
[ 105.826617] main: 247
[ 105.826728] main: 242
[ 105.826840] main: 247
[ 105.826950] main: 250
[ 105.827272] check_compaction: 98
[ 105.827589] check_compaction: 105
[ 105.827849] check_compaction: 111
[ 105.828152] check_compaction: 118
[ 105.828451] check_compaction: 123
the runtime code is like
-------------------
110
111 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
112 /* Start with the initial condition of 0 huge pages*/
113 if (write(fd, "0", sizeof(char)) != sizeof(char)) {
114 perror("Failed to write 0 to
/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages\n");
115 goto close_fd;
116 }
117
118 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
119 lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
120
121 /* Request a large number of huge pages. The Kernel will
allocate
122 as much as it can */
123 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
124 if (write(fd, "100000", (6*sizeof(char))) !=
(6*sizeof(char))) {
125 perror("Failed to write 100000 to
/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages\n");
126 goto close_fd;
127 }
-------------------
Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: 0Day can reproduce this issue in 20% on 0Day.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody can help have a look?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Zhjian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>>> linux-kselftest" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 7:53 Li Zhijian
2018-02-09 21:11 ` Dan Rue
2018-02-11 5:44 ` Li Zhijian
2018-02-12 3:26 ` Li Zhijian
2018-02-12 9:58 ` Li Zhijian [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cdc12c4-a85f-f1bd-8008-52296f90da3a@intel.com \
--to=zhijianx.li@intel.com \
--cc=dan.rue@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=philip.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®