From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8563D953A; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 05:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791523027; cv=none; b=RfYvMIsjllxSk+XPVnhMXEWzWDEl4HR1ZgBH/VhwhUVEbFugHnbLzBedFwTieOjsJ9/f+Ktu4d44nJEWs3hpPKPJRI0e1gLHNZlJHLHS0P2s5BrG2cupynR5wdoEBC2ubEIYr7VFtPwszFTR+v5MJ9rmymdkD+Bi83NMxe6504s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791523027; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GoaoFDCjtgPq5kGR7uK1nDvJ4v8gZ15Od56/qm3XMpA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ZL1go8jt4MGaH3AHs0RCpy51LWhtcslEyTgyvRfqWYE8bMN+AIhbuKRbfHntyrhexRpD+PmcLO4i0N3E04DXFrdKmmeTL+2Kf3MxkRX/h80+msgDMf0236HuDoZQvrw0IhhfNCTcrUJ8jVLJBLymbzl3C4nUcDO/vRXVlgBtVgU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C6QSNnrn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C6QSNnrn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 239411F000FF; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 05:17:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791523026; bh=zlQzHhNYHeezv0CHWq/KQXNtURr4uK8Q/GGVJb8f6/Q=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=C6QSNnrnRQPaL1PGcClrBVcgDeBuRZvhh3NOT9UVUzpeXaJDgszbB+TITVrmSvc+B +ow72nsJaYTphs3y2ikhQplokjr7hBSBblEbjEuRbjwHTlz6NgdwqXo0Euwy6dnWp3 TG7A4+hLYmMgygQE0M6yc22ICKZIbPSd8mT748KYMv8u56JesZyWTVn85RKOk6XiYc s8HVp2NCn/3oATR/z4ev6t/A1PQCtYMi6jPTJMvuwzhKh59DN/RMeCYDdUj1tXr71d lnY6EnNjlmL97HfiOlY+q27mMQveQHuWuNnrI+mSPUQ3irIOwj0rfc70/GS9KoTyRa csasvCQdS/Xeg== Message-ID: <5ce181b5-af31-48c4-9199-feadf24af27a@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 07:17:00 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/3] selftests: net: packetdrill: test RACK after partial undo To: nramaswamy@openai.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Neal Cardwell , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Yuchung Cheng , Jiayuan Chen , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Eric Dumazet In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/9/26 07:00, nramaswamy@openai.com wrote: > From: Neil Ramaswamy > > Reproduces a partial undo bug where a segment is unmarked as lost but is > never returned to RACK's timestamp sorted list, which makes it ineligible > for future fast retransmission. > > Signed-off-by: Neil Ramaswamy > Assisted-by: LLM sparse > --- Was this test changed since last time? I thought I already reviewed it. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7a977ccc-b6e5-4430-8ffa-fbde5ed9f4f9@kernel.org/ You are supposed to carry the reviews from Vx to Vy if no significant change happened. Please do whatever it takes to reduce our huge load. Thanks.