From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] hantro: Rework how encoder and decoder are identified
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:58:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d18057b7bc686eeb470810acd3ab63f9b4bf224.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200625163525.5119-4-ezequiel@collabora.com>
Hi Ezequiel,
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 13:35 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> So far we've been using the .buf_finish hook to distinguish
> decoder from encoder. This is unnecessarily obfuscated.
>
> Moreover, we want to move the buf_finish, so use a cleaner
> scheme to distinguish the driver decoder/encoder type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h | 2 ++
> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h
> index 3005207fc6fb..028b788ad50f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h
> @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ struct hantro_dev {
> *
> * @dev: VPU driver data to which the context belongs.
> * @fh: V4L2 file handler.
> + * @is_encoder: Decoder or encoder context?
> *
> * @sequence_cap: Sequence counter for capture queue
> * @sequence_out: Sequence counter for output queue
> @@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ struct hantro_dev {
> struct hantro_ctx {
> struct hantro_dev *dev;
> struct v4l2_fh fh;
> + bool is_encoder;
>
> u32 sequence_cap;
> u32 sequence_out;
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> index 0db8ad455160..112ed556eb90 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void device_run(void *priv)
>
> bool hantro_is_encoder_ctx(const struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - return ctx->buf_finish == hantro_enc_buf_finish;
> + return ctx->is_encoder;
> }
Now this function feels a little superfluous. Why not replace
hantro_is_encoder_ctx(ctx)
with
ctx->is_encoder
everywhere?
regards
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-25 16:35 [PATCH 0/6] Hantro low-hanging cleanups Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-25 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] hantro: h264: Remove unused macro definition Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-25 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] hantro: h264: Rename scaling list handling function Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-25 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] hantro: Rework how encoder and decoder are identified Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-26 7:58 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2020-06-26 18:30 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-26 9:52 ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-26 18:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-25 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] hantro: Move hantro_enc_buf_finish to JPEG codec_ops.done Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-25 16:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] hantro: Remove unused bytesused argument Ezequiel Garcia
2020-06-25 16:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] hantro: Make sure we don't use post-processor on an encoder Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d18057b7bc686eeb470810acd3ab63f9b4bf224.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®