From: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
To: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] eventfd new tag EFD_VPOLL: generate epoll events
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 22:11:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d44edf655e193789823094d1b4301fd@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603150010.GE4312@cs.unibo.it>
Hi Renzo,
On 2019-06-03 17:00, Renzo Davoli wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> I sorry for the delay in my answer, but I needed to set up a minimal
> tutorial to show what I am working on and why I need a feature like the
> one I am proposing.
>
> Please, have a look of the README.md page here:
> https://github.com/virtualsquare/vuos
> (everything can be downloaded and tested)
Is that similar to what user-mode linux does? I mean the principle.
> I am not trying to port some tools to use user-space implemented
> stacks or device
> drivers/emulators, I am seeking to a general purpose approach.
You still intersect *each* syscall, why not to do the same for
epoll_wait()
and replace events with correct value? Seems you do something similar
already
in a vu_wrap_poll.c: wo_epoll_wait(), right?
Don't get me wrong, I really want to understand whether everything
really
looks so bad without proposed change. It seems not, because the whole
principle
is based on intersection of each syscall, thus one more one less - it
does not
become more clean and especially does not look like a generic purpose
solution,
which you seek. I may be wrong.
--
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-06 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-26 14:25 Renzo Davoli
2019-05-26 20:24 ` kbuild test robot
2019-05-26 20:49 ` kbuild test robot
2019-05-27 3:09 ` kbuild test robot
2019-05-27 7:33 ` Greg KH
2019-05-27 13:36 ` Renzo Davoli
2019-05-31 9:34 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 10:45 ` Renzo Davoli
2019-05-31 11:48 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-06-03 15:00 ` Renzo Davoli
2019-06-06 20:11 ` Roman Penyaev [this message]
2019-06-07 9:40 ` Renzo Davoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d44edf655e193789823094d1b4301fd@suse.de \
--to=rpenyaev@suse.de \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome