mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineethp@amazon.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kamatam@amazon.com>, <aliguori@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] namei: revert old behaviour for filename_lookup with LOOKUP_PARENT flag
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:41:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d487c39-25e9-2903-1fd9-ca6d870c0e7b@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013202622.GS19539@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On 10/13/2016 01:26 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:09:04PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 07:58:51PM +0000, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
>>> filename_lookup used to return success for non-existing file when called
>>> with LOOKUP_PARENT flag. This behaviour was changed with
>>> commit 8bcb77fabd7c ("namei: split off filename_lookupat()
>>> with LOOKUP_PARENT")
>>>
>>> The above patch split parent lookup functionality to a different function
>>> filename_parentat and changed all calls to filename_lookup(LOOKUP_PARENT)
>>> to the new function filename_parentat. But functions like kern_path which
>>> passed the flags directly to filename_lookup regressed due to this.
>>>
>>> This patch aims to fix the regressed behaviour by calling
>>> filename_parentat from filename_lookup if the flags contain LOOKUP_PARENT.
>> What callers shows te problems?  That's probaby were the fix need to got
>> in, and even if not that's still part of a good bug report.
> Out-of-tree, at a guess...  Incidentally, since filename_lookup() is not
> exported, it's probably kern_path() that gets used wherever it is.
> Depending on the details of what's being attempted,  kern_path_locked()
> might or might not be the right primitive to use, but I would probably
> start with checking if that's what the code in question really wants.
>
> Use:
> 	// kernel_string is an kernel pointer to NUL-terminated array of char
>
> 	struct path path;
> 	struct dentry *dentry;
>
> 	dentry = kern_path_locked(kernel_string, &path);
> 	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> 		// failed while getting the parent, or not a regular last
> 		// component (/, ., .., <something>/., <something>/..)
> 		sod off // no cleanup needed
>
> 	// now path contains the resolved parent and dentry points to the
> 	// dentry of child, possibly negative; the last component of the
> 	// name can be determined from dentry->d_name.  Parent directory
> 	// is locked, making sure that directory entry won't be changed
> 	// until you are done.
>
> 	if (d_is_really_negative(dentry)) {
> 		// parent exists, but child doesn't
> 	} else {
> 		// child exists
> 	}
>
> 	// clean up: drop dentry, unlock parent, drop dentry/vfsmount of parent
> 	dput(dentry);
> 	inode_unlock(path.dentry->d_inode);
> 	path_put(&path);
>
Yes, the use case is out-of-tree and the code snippet above depicts the 
use .
Since kern_path_locked is also not exported, out-of-tree code used kern_path
for the existence check for directories.

One reference about this issue can be seen here.

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2459690?do=post_view_flat#2459690

We also have a customer who complained about this functionality change.

I understand that there has been no API promises been made to this API. 
But since this is an
exported function, the change in function could cause break in 
out-of-tree kernel code. I will
rephrase the commit message to say "change in functionality" instead of 
regression

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-13 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-13 19:58 Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2016-10-13 20:06 ` Al Viro
2016-10-13 20:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 20:26   ` Al Viro
2016-10-13 20:41     ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai [this message]
2016-10-13 20:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 21:24       ` Al Viro
2016-10-13 22:14         ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2016-10-13 23:31           ` Al Viro
2016-10-14  0:02             ` Remanan Pillai, Vineeth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d487c39-25e9-2903-1fd9-ca6d870c0e7b@amazon.com \
    --to=vineethp@amazon.com \
    --cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kamatam@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®