From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751619AbdJRV7g (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:59:36 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:46209 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041AbdJRV7f (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:59:35 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+STZQtVOaAuEHsjKikD3VmerODheAIWXE9e3DTc1LFFq3JN5DHfyeOle3qnOaPdH+A+EJPIxQ== Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] net: ethtool: add SmartNIC reset support To: Andy Gospodarek References: <1508342496-5047-1-git-send-email-scott.branden@broadcom.com> <20171018162823.GB15371@lunn.ch> <20171018191639.GI15371@lunn.ch> <20171018213058.GD2847@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net> Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , "Allan W. Nielsen" , Raju Lakkaraju , Florian Fainelli , BCM Kernel Feedback , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Lin , netdev From: Scott Branden Message-ID: <5d583bb0-1886-fe56-26c7-a80ba370ef2c@broadcom.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:59:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171018213058.GD2847@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org +netdev@vger.kernel.org On 17-10-18 02:30 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:31:28PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> >> On 17-10-18 12:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>>> Yes, there is also a management processor. >>> O.K. >>> >>> Maybe it would be nice to add some more text to the commit message to >>> make this clear. Define what an application processor is, and how it >>> differs from a management processor. But othersize: >> OK -will add more description to differentiate management processor vs. >> application processor(s). >>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn >>> >>> I assume you have another kernel patch to actually make use of this? >>> It is normal to post the user of a new API in the same series as the >>> API. >> I actually wanted to get agreement that the bit define could be added to >> ethtool before implementing it in driver. >> If this direction approved we'll implement in driver and submit with this >> patch series. > I just noticed that you did not also post this to netdev@vger.kernel.org. I > suspect you are more likely to get review and acceptance if that list is cc'd. > > I'm not positive that Linus will take networking patches off this list. > >>> Andrew >> Thanks, >> Scott